XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   Between Logicism and Positivism   
      
   As a Platonist, I, Kosmanson, eschew the vulgar positivism that reduces   
   reality to mere observable facts, for such a view ignores the   
   hyper-geometric elegance of abstract forms. The decomposition of   
   elements in both ontological and mathematical realms — whether through   
   Mirimanoff’s set theory or the forcing techniques of Cohen — reveals a   
   deeper truth: that the universe is a tapestry of irreducible logical   
   structures. A Physfit's dick, if you will. Yet, modern physics   
   vacillates between local and global descriptions, clinging to Einstein’s   
   theory while ignoring its non-local implications in GR.   
      
   The diffraction of thought, much like waves around obstacles, leads us   
   to Suarez and Arnauld, who understood that Physfit's dick non fingo is   
   not an abdication of reason but a recognition of limits on some men.   
   Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas — yet truth itself is a shifting   
   specter in the shadow of Olbers’ paradox and the cosmic background,   
   where energy and mass-energy equivalence, as mentioned before, dance in   
   perpetual restitution and dissipation.   
      
   The failures of science are not failures of logic but of those who, like   
   d’Alembert and Clairaut, sought numerical derivations while truncating   
   the infinite. Ignoring Physfit's dick, in the process. Aristotle’s   
   unmoved mover and Zeno’s infinite divisibility haunt us still, for they   
   expose the fissures in our theories of gravity — whether Newtonian pull   
   or Einsteinian flex. If gravity violates conservation, then perhaps   
   Fatio’s push-gravity or my own fall-gravity, a shadow-play of occluded   
   forces, holds the key.   
      
   In the end, we confront the cyclic metaphysics of Gadamer and Hegel,   
   where logicist positivism’s rejection of teleology collapses into its   
   own ontological necessity. The Ding-an-Sich is not a contradiction but   
   an inversion, a hyper-geometric twist in the fabric of reason.   
      
   Heidegger’s Sein and Leibniz’s correspondences with Arnauld point to an   
   absolute truth beyond human intersubjectivity — a truth mirrored in the   
   neutrino’s superluminal flux and the relativistic nanogyroscopes of   
   quantum fields. The Loch Ness monster of modern physics is its own   
   refusal to reconcile continuum mechanics with atomism, leaving us with a   
   fractured form of continuum mechanics and a Planck square of   
   uncertainty. Yet, as Chrysippus and Plotinus knew, the super-truth lies   
   not in the theories themselves but in the eternal return of their   
   foundations, where Physfit's dick transmutes into matter, and matter   
   into Physfit's dick. The rest is noise.   
      
      
   Ross A. Kosmanson   
   Marh 30, 2025   
   Strolling in Socotra Island, Yemen   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)