Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,340 of 178,769    |
|    Ross Finlayson to Ross Finlayson    |
|    Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. K    |
|    30 Mar 25 21:49:54    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>> represent primitive theories within a larger heno-theory is intriguing.       >>> This suggests that these fundamental mathematical domains are       >>> not merely separate disciplines but rather elements of a more       >>> comprehensive logical structure.       >>> They are like the two sides of the same coin.       >>> Pre-Geometric as a Primitive Theory:       >>> The pre-geometric/pre-scientific world, as envisioned by       >>> Husserl and Derrida, can be seen as a primordial, primitive theory, an       >>> "ur-theory" that precedes and underlies all subsequent theoretical       >>> developments.       >>> This "ur-theory" would contain the "ur-elements" that       >>> constitute the building blocks of geometry and algebra.       >>> Mathematical Universe Hypothesis:       >>> The mathematical universe hypothesis, which posits that the       >>> universe is fundamentally mathematical, provides a framework for       >>> understanding how these theoretical elements can comprise each other.       >>> Within this hypothesis, geometry and algebra are not merely       >>> abstract concepts but rather the very fabric of reality.       >>> The "ur-elements" are the fundamental mathematical structures       >>> that create the universe.       >>> Platonistic Elements:       >>> The strong technical Platonism you mention is crucial. It       >>> suggests that these theoretical elements are not merely mental       >>> constructs but rather objective, independent realities.       >>> The elements are real, and the source of reality.       >>>       >>> Logic, Reason, and the Arrival at This Concept:       >>>       >>> Logic and Reason as Tools:       >>> Logic and reason are essential tools for constructing and       >>> exploring the concept of a heno-theory.       >>> They allow us to identify the underlying structures that       >>> connect seemingly disparate theories.       >>> They help us to navigate the complex relationships between       >>> geometry, algebra, and the pre-geometric.       >>> Limits of Logic and Reason:       >>> However, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of logic       >>> and reason.       >>> The concept of a heno-theory, particularly when it involves the       >>> mathematical universe hypothesis, pushes the boundaries of our current       >>> understanding.       >>> It raises questions that may not be fully resolvable through       >>> purely logical or rational means.       >>> Intuition and Metaphysical Speculation:       >>> Intuition and metaphysical speculation may play a significant       >>> role in our exploration of this concept.       >>> The idea of a primordial "ur-theory" or a mathematical universe       >>> may require a leap of imagination beyond the confines of strict logical       >>> deduction.       >>> It is a conceptual leap, that may or may not be true.       >>> A Priori and A Posteriori:       >>> A combination of a priori, and a posteriori reasoning is       >>> required. A priori reasoning is needed to derive the logical       >>> consistancies of the system. A posteriori reasoning is needed to relate       >>> the system to the world.       >>>       >>> In essence, you're proposing a grand synthesis of mathematical and       >>> philosophical ideas, a quest for a unified understanding of reality.       >>> Logic and reason are essential tools in this quest, but they may need to       >>> be supplemented by intuition and metaphysical speculation.       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>> Thanks GG. Beyond referencing Plato, then furthermore the canon of       >>> German idealism after Greek idealism, as the schools are so broadly       >>> collected, has for Kant a particular comment on "The Sublime" and the       >>> "Ding-an-Sich" as with regards to being, and then Hegel in the       >>> Wissenschaft der Logik makes a great case for, similarly as to Leibniz'       >>> monadology and universals, and Wittgenstein's spark of a platonic       >>> treatise in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, and otherwise as of the       >>> Tractatus, that mostly the more mature philosophically analytical       >>> tradition is actually reflections on that, not the other way around,       >>> similarly as to how above it's deduction _first_ and continuity _first_,       >>> that deduction and continuity may arrive at, without stipulation, and       >>> that "inverse" is a mere deliberation and contemplation itself,       >>> eschewing "contradiction" while still supplying "The Principle of       >>> Sufficient, i.e. Thorough, Reason".       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>> You've woven together a rich tapestry of philosophical ideas, connecting       >>> Greek and German idealism, Kant's sublime and Ding-an-sich, Hegel's       >>> logic, Leibniz's monadology, Wittgenstein's Tractatus, and the       >>> analytical tradition, all within the context of a deduction-first and       >>> continuity-first approach. Let's unpack this complex argument:       >>>       >>> German Idealism and the Sublime/Ding-an-Sich:       >>>       >>> Kant's Influence:       >>> Kant's concept of the "sublime" points to the limits of human       >>> understanding in the face of the infinite or overwhelming. It suggests a       >>> realm beyond our cognitive grasp, a hint of the "Ding-an-sich"       >>> (thing-in-itself).       >>>       >>> The "Ding-an-sich" represents the ultimate reality, which remains       >>> inaccessible to direct experience. This aligns with a sense of a deeper,       >>> underlying being that transcends our phenomenal world.       >>>       >>> Hegel's Logic:       >>>       >>> Hegel's "Wissenschaft der Logik" (Science of Logic) attempts to       >>> overcome the limitations of Kant's dualism by developing a dialectical       >>> system that encompasses both the phenomenal and the noumenal.       >>>       >>> Hegel's logic, like Leibniz's monadology, seeks to find a unified system       >>> that explains the interconnectedness of all things.       >>> Hegel's logic is a logic of becoming, and of continuity.       >>>       >>> Leibniz's Monadology and Universals:       >>> Leibniz's monadology, with its concept of individual,       >>> self-contained "monads" reflecting the entire universe, contributes to       >>> the idea of a unified underlying reality.       >>> His theory of universals also suggests a platonic realm of       >>> abstract ideas that underlie the physical world.       >>>       >>> Wittgenstein's Tractatus and the Analytical Tradition:       >>>       >>> Tractatus as Platonic Spark:       >>> You're suggesting that Wittgenstein's "Tractatus       >>> Logico-Philosophicus," despite its seemingly analytical approach,       >>> contains a "platonic spark," a hint of a deeper, underlying logical       >>> structure that transcends language.       >>> The Tractatus's emphasis on logical form and the limits of       >>> language can be seen as a reflection on the nature of being, similar to       >>> the concerns of German idealism.       >>> Analytical Tradition as Reflection:       >>> Your assertion that the analytical tradition is actually a       >>> reflection of these earlier idealistic and platonic ideas, rather than       >>> the other way around, is a powerful claim.       >>> It suggests that the analytical emphasis on logic and language       >>> is ultimately rooted in a deeper metaphysical quest for understanding       >>> the nature of reality.       >>> Deduction and Continuity First:       >>> The idea of deduction and continuity being primary aligns with       >>> this view. It suggests that these fundamental logical and mathematical       >>> principles are not derived from experience but rather precede and       >>> underlie it.       >>> That the analytical tradition is attempting to describe the       >>> structure that is revealed by deduction, and continuity.              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca