XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/5/25 9:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> only   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> crude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> truth:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> being.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> null   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> higher   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> continuum’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the infinite.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> laws —   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> energy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> dogma.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> among   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> them   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> surface   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> meets   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always do.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> But   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> when   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this! And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Turkmenistan   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> interest   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrong".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying anything at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> all,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical continuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ruliality   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> impasse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> repleteness   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> altogether   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> mathematics,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> dumbness).   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)