XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/5/25 9:40 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > On 4/5/25 9:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >> On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> being.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> null   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuum’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws —   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dogma.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> among   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> them   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter,   
   about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meets   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do. But   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Turkmenistan   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> interest   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> anything at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> all,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ruliality   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> impasse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> repleteness   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)