XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/5/25 9:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > On 4/5/25 9:40 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >> On 4/5/25 9:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>> On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not only   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luminous truth:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their null   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuum’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws —   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dogma.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meets   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do. But   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> labyrinths   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this! And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Turkmenistan   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feynman on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> continua,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruliality   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> impasse,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)