XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/5/25 10:30 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > On 4/5/25 9:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >> On 4/5/25 9:40 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>> On 4/5/25 9:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/5/25 3:48 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>> On 4/5/25 2:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 04/05/2025 12:28 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 4/5/25 2:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not only   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crude   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luminous truth:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fractures in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their null   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> axiom   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invitation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuum’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fools’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errand; the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spin   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echoing the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fictitious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws —   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> linear dogma.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truncated   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> among   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ouroboros   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sinking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeper   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surface   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmology is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ding-an-Sich   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meets   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradoxical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do. But   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> labyrinths   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collapse   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this! And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stamp   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Turkmenistan   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inspired   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kosmanson.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be wrong".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not-particles.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> falsifiable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feynman on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)