home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 177,465 of 178,769   
   greysky to All   
   The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Princ   
   07 Apr 25 21:37:40   
   
   From: ftlsite@hotmail.com   
      
                 The Blinding Light of Overhype   
   Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica is often   
   heralded as the pinnacle of intellectual achievement, as if its mere   
   existence single-handedly flung humanity out of the Dark Ages and into   
   the glorious light of scientific progress. The truth, however, is far   
   less flattering. Yes, the Principia formalized the laws of motion and   
   universal gravitation, but let’s not pretend Newton came down from Mount   
   Olympus with truths engraved on stone tablets. He built upon ideas   
   painstakingly developed by others—Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes, to   
   name a few. Yet, in true Newtonian fashion, his ego managed to eclipse   
   theirs entirely, leaving them as little more than footnotes in his story   
   of supposed genius.   
      
                  The Calculus Conundrum   
   And let’s talk about calculus, shall we? Because if there’s anything   
   more infuriating than Newton’s obsessive need for credit, it’s his   
   bitter feud with Leibniz over who invented it. The Principia, while   
   groundbreaking, drips with Newton’s habit of encoding his findings in   
   obscure geometric methods, almost as if he were trying to make himself   
   indispensable to the scientific elite. He could’ve leveraged the   
   calculus he worked so hard to develop, but no—he locked it behind layers   
   of unnecessary complexity, turning what should have been a triumph of   
   clarity into an academic power play. Brilliant? Sure. Benevolent? Hardly.   
      
               Unforgiving Genius, Relentless Obscurity   
   Reading the Principia is less like beholding a masterpiece and more like   
   wading through molasses while being lectured by an unsympathetic genius   
   who refuses to simplify anything for mere mortals. Newton had no   
   interest in making his work accessible—he wasn’t writing for humanity;   
   he was writing for posterity. His dense, Latin-filled prose and   
   labyrinthine diagrams are the antithesis of user-friendliness, ensuring   
   that only the most dedicated scholars could decipher his findings.   
   Perhaps that’s why it became so revered—it’s easier to idolize something   
   you don’t understand than to admit it might just be intentionally   
   inscrutable.   
      
                             Conclusion   
   And if Newton’s Principia wasn’t enough of a monument to his   
   insufferable arrogance, let’s not forget his later years—when the   
   so-called ‘father of modern science’ turned into a glorified   
   executioner. Yes, our dear Isaac, the man who supposedly unlocked the   
   secrets of the universe, spent his twilight years gleefully hunting down   
   forgers and sending them to the gallows. Imagine it: Newton, perched in   
   the shadows, watching as the trapdoor swung open and necks snapped, all   
   in the name of justice. Justice? No, this was entertainment for him—a   
   grotesque spectacle that families, children in tow, would gather to   
   watch as if it were a carnival. And Newton? He wasn’t just a bystander;   
   he was the architect of their doom, wielding his power with the same   
   cold precision he used to calculate the motion of planets.   
   "This is the man we revere? A man who could unravel the mysteries of the   
   cosmos but found equal satisfaction in the crack of a noose? The   
   Principia may have changed the world, but its author was no hero. He was   
   a man who hoarded knowledge, crushed rivals, and, in his later years,   
   turned his intellect toward the grim machinery of death. So yes,   
   Newton’s legacy is undeniable, but let’s not pretend it’s unblemished.   
   His genius was as dark as it was brilliant, and the Principia stands as   
   both a triumph of human intellect and a chilling reminder of the man who   
   wrote it. A man who, for all his brilliance, seemed to find as much joy   
   in the gallows as he did in the stars.   
      
      
   ...I figured this would bring a smile to some of your faces...   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca