Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,465 of 178,769    |
|    greysky to All    |
|    The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Princ    |
|    07 Apr 25 21:37:40    |
      From: ftlsite@hotmail.com               The Blinding Light of Overhype       Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica is often       heralded as the pinnacle of intellectual achievement, as if its mere       existence single-handedly flung humanity out of the Dark Ages and into       the glorious light of scientific progress. The truth, however, is far       less flattering. Yes, the Principia formalized the laws of motion and       universal gravitation, but let’s not pretend Newton came down from Mount       Olympus with truths engraved on stone tablets. He built upon ideas       painstakingly developed by others—Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes, to       name a few. Yet, in true Newtonian fashion, his ego managed to eclipse       theirs entirely, leaving them as little more than footnotes in his story       of supposed genius.               The Calculus Conundrum       And let’s talk about calculus, shall we? Because if there’s anything       more infuriating than Newton’s obsessive need for credit, it’s his       bitter feud with Leibniz over who invented it. The Principia, while       groundbreaking, drips with Newton’s habit of encoding his findings in       obscure geometric methods, almost as if he were trying to make himself       indispensable to the scientific elite. He could’ve leveraged the       calculus he worked so hard to develop, but no—he locked it behind layers       of unnecessary complexity, turning what should have been a triumph of       clarity into an academic power play. Brilliant? Sure. Benevolent? Hardly.               Unforgiving Genius, Relentless Obscurity       Reading the Principia is less like beholding a masterpiece and more like       wading through molasses while being lectured by an unsympathetic genius       who refuses to simplify anything for mere mortals. Newton had no       interest in making his work accessible—he wasn’t writing for humanity;       he was writing for posterity. His dense, Latin-filled prose and       labyrinthine diagrams are the antithesis of user-friendliness, ensuring       that only the most dedicated scholars could decipher his findings.       Perhaps that’s why it became so revered—it’s easier to idolize something       you don’t understand than to admit it might just be intentionally       inscrutable.               Conclusion       And if Newton’s Principia wasn’t enough of a monument to his       insufferable arrogance, let’s not forget his later years—when the       so-called ‘father of modern science’ turned into a glorified       executioner. Yes, our dear Isaac, the man who supposedly unlocked the       secrets of the universe, spent his twilight years gleefully hunting down       forgers and sending them to the gallows. Imagine it: Newton, perched in       the shadows, watching as the trapdoor swung open and necks snapped, all       in the name of justice. Justice? No, this was entertainment for him—a       grotesque spectacle that families, children in tow, would gather to       watch as if it were a carnival. And Newton? He wasn’t just a bystander;       he was the architect of their doom, wielding his power with the same       cold precision he used to calculate the motion of planets.       "This is the man we revere? A man who could unravel the mysteries of the       cosmos but found equal satisfaction in the crack of a noose? The       Principia may have changed the world, but its author was no hero. He was       a man who hoarded knowledge, crushed rivals, and, in his later years,       turned his intellect toward the grim machinery of death. So yes,       Newton’s legacy is undeniable, but let’s not pretend it’s unblemished.       His genius was as dark as it was brilliant, and the Principia stands as       both a triumph of human intellect and a chilling reminder of the man who       wrote it. A man who, for all his brilliance, seemed to find as much joy       in the gallows as he did in the stars.                     ...I figured this would bring a smile to some of your faces...              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca