From: x@x.org
On 4/7/25 20:33, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Bertitaylor wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:38:43 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:12:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> and zero experimental
>>>>> information on the subject,
>>>>
>>>> Wrong Arindam found in 2005 that the Michelson Morley interferometer
>>>> experiment showed that the results actually showed that light speed
>>>> varied with the emitter. That knocked out the basis for e=mcc.
>>>
>>> The first such experiment was performed in 1881.
>>>
>>> Susequent experiments, of which there were about 33 peformed between
>>> 1887 and 2015 with ever increasing sensitivity and accuracy, all agree
>>> with the original 1881 experiment null result with ever decreasing
>>> possible error.
>>>
>>> The current result maximum deviation from a null result is less than
>>> 10^-18.
>>>
>> Quite, they religiously make the same mistake. Which is that the Earth's
>> movement (with the apparatus fixed on it
>
> Except, crackpot, not all the experiments done have used apparatus fixed
> on the Earth.
>
>> different paths) can only cause the nulls when the light speed is
>> variant.
>
> Delusional nonsense, crackpot.
>
>>
>> Arindam worked that out in 2005.
>
> So now you can explain in 2025 how experiments NOT fixed on the Earth
> get the same result Arindam.
I am thinking if it is practice and regularly done, then that is radio
detecting and ranging (RADAR).
The speed of light is rater fast but the electronics is also.
Those weather maps seem to keep working. Maybe some of the missiles
for a while as well.
As for this history of Einstein stuff, I tend to think that something
like 'laws of physics' might still be the same if something like
special and general relativity were though of by someone named 'Fred'.
>
>
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
