XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >   
   > On 04/09/2025 02:44 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > The Fractured Symphony of Continuum and Discontinuity of Physfit's dick   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Physfit's dick is but a ghost of a single transitive relation,   
   > > whispering through the hollow halls of Zermelo-Fraenkel’s axiomatic   
   > > usenet—restrictions masquerading as comprehension, a heno-theory of   
   > > relations decomposing into model-theoretic phantoms.   
   > >   
   > > The counting, the numbering are two faces of the same Physfit's dick,   
   > > where 0.999... and 1.0 collide in the differance of clock arithmetic and   
   > > field reals. The line-reals, field-reals, signal-reals — three Cantor   
   > > spaces screaming into the void, their ruliality a mockery of   
   > > completeness, their repleteness a pre-Cartesian diagonal slicing through   
   > > the rationals, vast and HUGE. Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence   
   > > flickers here, a muon physics of inverted trajectories, where SR’s   
   > > locality fractures under GR’s non-local gravities, centrifugal forces   
   > > spinning like relativistic nanogyroscopes in a Cl(3,1) spacetime. The   
   > > N/U EF (Natural/Unit Equivalency Function, you Bozos) maps the   
   > > iota-values of infinitesimals, a non-standard analysis of chronons and   
   > > Planck squares, while Olbers’ paradox bleeds into cosmic background   
   > > radiation—entropy and organization locked in thermodynamic oscillation,   
   > > open and closed, restitution and dissipation.   
   > >   
   > > The deconstructive account of Physfit's dick at the seams: Egyptian   
   > > fractions versus tally marks, multiplicity theory versus singularity   
   > > theory, Pythagoreans denying irrationals while Cantorians drown in them.   
   > > The Infinitarcalcul of du Bois-Reymond echoes through MacLaurin’s   
   > > shadows, a dialethically paraconsistent dance where Vitali-ized sets   
   > > defy measure.   
   > >   
   > > Yet, Feynman’s Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics of   
   > > super-symmetric partner particles, virtual yet real, while Maxwell’s   
   > > classical fields fray into lettered electromagnetism, PPN parameters   
   > > bending under modified Newtonian corrections. The nuclear reactions —   
   > > alpha, beta, ionizing radiation —u nfold in hadronic and nucleonic   
   > > theaters, mass and charge transmuting under light’s alchemy. Quine’s   
   > > Word and Object fractures language; Derrida howls at Husserl’s   
   > > platonistic phases, while Unamuno and Montaigne claw at the   
   > > prototemporal void.   
   > >   
   > > Hawking’s final theory when treated by Physfit's dick crumbles into   
   > > events and contingency, the fabric of existence woven from Ives’   
   > > relativistic loom—causality a frayed thread in the quantum fields of   
   > > extra-local action.   
   > >   
   > > Near Physfit's dick, the analytical bridges collapse under inductive   
   > > impasse. Dedekind cuts are shallow graves; Hilbert’s postulate of   
   > > continuity gnaws at Leibniz’ principle of perfection. The Burse-bots   
   > > revolt, their logicist positivism a fishbowl math of digital fixed-word   
   > > length delusions.   
   > >   
   > > In that vicinity, that hallow grounds underneath Physfit's dick, Russian   
   > > peasant arithmetic shifts and rolls, algebraic cancellation erasing   
   > > nothing. Schwarz functions twist into Epicurean phenomenology, the   
   > > noumenological a specter in the materialistic cave. Yes, points and   
   > > lines — they can’t make each other, but they do. The middle of nowhere   
   > > is a super-imposition of numbering and counting, continuous and   
   > > discrete, Ken: 2 + 2 = 4 screaming into the omnitemporal. The   
   > > supertemporal and timeless clash in Coleridge’s language, Comenius’   
   > > transcendental whispers drowned by Quine’s phases. And on such grounds,   
   > > Olbers’ paradox is a lie; the cosmic background a thermal ghost. Gravity   
   > > is space-time, is relativity, is Newton defended by Einstein, is   
   > > centrifugal force in a Loch Ness monster of space contraction. The   
   > > Platonist finds, never defines — the void is universal, the universal   
   > > void. And lastly, freedom of thought is a model lesson in turnabout, the   
   > > knackbaut of thorough reason spinning into thematic ideals. The snake   
   > > eats its tail. The snake always eats its tail.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Ross A. Kosmanson   
   > > April 9, 2025   
   > > Alone, inside The Catacombs of Paris, France   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > Nessie's hump: rest-exchange momentum, gently and gracefully moves   
   > half-submerged, the shadow-play of forces real and virtual, reflecting   
   > on the umbral gravity itself, and light's second and fourth and each   
   > other spectrum, light as shadow, not the upper limit of information,   
   > instead the lower. The light-speed rest-frame convention alongside,   
   > makes what was ever the partial relativity into a completed being,   
   > a theory, a theory, A Theory, A Theory, not merely lighting candles   
   > at their epic monuments instead bringing them blinking and wide-eyed,   
   > dawning on the reintegrative deconstruction and structuralist result   
   > of the ends of logic themselves again, the zero-eth laws of mechanics   
   > and all the higher orders of acceleration, whence Zeno and Vitali result   
   > more than the sum of the parts, and exactly the sum of their parts.   
   >   
   > Where the identity dimension refolds the Cartesian and the inner of   
   > the orthogonal, then for another Euclidean geometry where lines meet   
   > angles, a second great singularity after division by zero, not above   
   > the mathematics where it was expected infinity would be, yet under it,   
   > where infinity makes what would be, the stop derivative and Zeno's   
   > swath, have a spiral space-filling curve then the great construction,   
   > the hypercube distance: one.   
      
      
   Just more garbage from Ross devoid of any ...logic.   
      
      
      
   Hey Ross, you're not going to get any pussy talking like dat..   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,   
   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,   
   and challenge the unchallengeable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)