Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,499 of 178,769    |
|    The Starmaker to The Starmaker    |
|    Re: Why does the universe go to all the     |
|    10 Apr 25 22:58:06    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math       From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com              The Starmaker wrote:       >       > The Starmaker wrote:       > >       > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > >       > > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > > >       > > > > Stephen Hawking once asked:       > > > >       > > > > Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?       > > > >       > > > > If Stephen Hawking would like an answer       > > > > to that question, has he ever consider       > > > > asking a woman that question?       > > > >       > > > > I don't mean a woman scientist..       > > > >       > > > > i mean, just any woman.       > > > >       > > > > Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is       > > > > entitled to know the answer?       > > > >       > > > > Is he Moses?       > > >       > > > I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.       > > >       > > > But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels       > > > "bother"..       > > >       > > > Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?       > > >       > > > Mother Nature?       > > >       > > > Is something bothering her?       > > >       > > > Yous science guys make no sense...       > > >       > >       > > It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosophy (bother)       > > to try       > > to understand the universe...       > >       > > and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.       > >       > > Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being       > > ...rational.       > >       > > put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.              Okay, I see yous people have not clue (including Stephen Hawking)...              Stephen Hawking is searching for a 'rational' answer...              Clue number one: The universe isn't 'bothered'..              the reason Why numbers don't exist is because the universe is neither ratioanl       or irrational.              Imaginay numbers.                     Logic gots nothing to do with it.              The Universe 'simply' is ...unaware.              So, the universe is not 'bothered'.                     It has absolutely has no awareness you are here.                     And, (ask the math girls) there are no real numbers in a universe that is       neither rational nor irrational.                            Look up there in the universe, (my gawd it's filled with rocks!) you see a lot       of 'rocks'..              rocks are neither rational nor irrational...              they are not even ...bothered at all.                     Why does the rock go to all the bother of existing? Answer: No bother at all.       It's just...there.                                                                                                                --       The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,       to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,       and challenge the unchallengeable.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca