XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/14/25 2:01 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > rhertz  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and   
   >> influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck   
   >> didn't have this.   
   >   
   > Why should we believe anything you write   
   > when you can't even get simple facts like this right?   
   >   
   > Jan   
      
      
   What difference does it make what happened anyway. I don't understand   
   you guys in this relativity forum.   
      
   Some physics were developed and that's it. The important thing is the   
   physics not the history of physics. Doesn't matter who did what.   
      
   And all these human names Priests have packed into it. Concepts as well   
   as units and rules and even some formulas! All with human names on them.   
   Are you people nuts?..   
      
   Leave science in the hands of cro-magnons and their tribal instinct will   
   turn any physics source into a history of it instead.   
      
   One day, when science goes back to the people it belongs, you won't find   
   a single human name inside any physics text.   
      
   It is disgusting how things are, thanks to you cro-magnon early humans.   
   There's reason I leave it to my dick to handle you dimwits.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)