XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 4/15/25 11:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:   
   > it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that Albert Einstein is no   
   > Einstein.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > rhertz wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Chat with DeepSeek:   
   >>   
   >> QUESTION:   
   >>   
   >> Tell me about the "54 pages Einstein-Besso manuscript" that Besso HELD   
   >> until his death in 1953. When this manuscript emerged, and was subject   
   >> to public auction in 1992, it also emerged fierce criticisms from   
   >> scholars during such dark period (1954-1990), which showed (with hundred   
   >> of references) how WRONG was the approach of the team on the Mercury   
   >> problem. It included an error of 3 magnitudes and negative sign in the   
   >> final calculation. Now, it's in public domain. Which is your opinion of   
   >> such manuscript and why do you believe it was hidden for 40 years by   
   >> Besso?   
   >>   
   >> DEEPSEEK ANSWER:   
   >>   
   >> The Einstein-Besso manuscript (1913) is one of the most controversial   
   >> and revealing documents in the history of general relativity (GR). Its   
   >> contents, hidden by Michele Besso until his death in 1953 and later   
   >> auctioned in 1992, expose critical errors in Einstein’s early   
   approach   
   >> to the Mercury perihelion problem—errors that were orders of   
   magnitude   
   >> wrong and even had the wrong sign in calculations.   
   >>   
   >> ...   
      
      
   Star, tell him that's how science works. The way to get there is messy   
   and full of mistakes, but some eventually get there! The sugar coating   
   comes later for sex reasons :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)