XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Physfitfreak  wrote:   
      
   > On 4/14/25 2:01 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > > rhertz  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and   
   > >> influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck   
   > >> didn't have this.   
   > >   
   > > Why should we believe anything you write   
   > > when you can't even get simple facts like this right?   
   > >   
   > > Jan   
   >   
   >   
   > What difference does it make what happened anyway. I don't understand   
   > you guys in this relativity forum.   
   >   
   > Some physics were developed and that's it. The important thing is the   
   > physics not the history of physics. Doesn't matter who did what.   
   >   
   > And all these human names Priests have packed into it. Concepts as well   
   > as units and rules and even some formulas! All with human names on them.   
   > Are you people nuts?..   
      
   Perhaps, but it is a very human trait.   
   Things memorise more easily when there is a name attached to it.   
      
   For example, even asteroids get names.   
   Asteroid 1001 Gaussia for example may be easier on the brain   
   than the provisional designation 1923 OA.   
   Asteroid 'Gaussia' will even be understood if the number is forgotten,   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)