XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: wormfood@compostpunk.com   
      
   On 4/10/2025 3:11 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   > On 04/10/2025 12:07 AM, The Starmaker wrote:   
   >> Ross Finlayson wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On 04/09/2025 02:44 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The Fractured Symphony of Continuum and Discontinuity of Physfit's dick   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Physfit's dick is but a ghost of a single transitive relation,   
   >>>> whispering through the hollow halls of Zermelo-Fraenkel’s axiomatic   
   >>>> usenet—restrictions masquerading as comprehension, a heno-theory of   
   >>>> relations decomposing into model-theoretic phantoms.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The counting, the numbering are two faces of the same Physfit's dick,   
   >>>> where 0.999... and 1.0 collide in the differance of clock arithmetic   
   >>>> and   
   >>>> field reals. The line-reals, field-reals, signal-reals — three   
   Cantor   
   >>>> spaces screaming into the void, their ruliality a mockery of   
   >>>> completeness, their repleteness a pre-Cartesian diagonal slicing   
   >>>> through   
   >>>> the rationals, vast and HUGE. Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence   
   >>>> flickers here, a muon physics of inverted trajectories, where SR’s   
   >>>> locality fractures under GR’s non-local gravities, centrifugal   
   forces   
   >>>> spinning like relativistic nanogyroscopes in a Cl(3,1) spacetime. The   
   >>>> N/U EF (Natural/Unit Equivalency Function, you Bozos) maps the   
   >>>> iota-values of infinitesimals, a non-standard analysis of chronons and   
   >>>> Planck squares, while Olbers’ paradox bleeds into cosmic background   
   >>>> radiation—entropy and organization locked in thermodynamic   
   >>>> oscillation,   
   >>>> open and closed, restitution and dissipation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The deconstructive account of Physfit's dick at the seams: Egyptian   
   >>>> fractions versus tally marks, multiplicity theory versus singularity   
   >>>> theory, Pythagoreans denying irrationals while Cantorians drown in   
   >>>> them.   
   >>>> The Infinitarcalcul of du Bois-Reymond echoes through MacLaurin’s   
   >>>> shadows, a dialethically paraconsistent dance where Vitali-ized sets   
   >>>> defy measure.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yet, Feynman’s Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum   
   >>>> mechanics of   
   >>>> super-symmetric partner particles, virtual yet real, while    
   axwell’s   
   >>>> classical fields fray into lettered electromagnetism, PPN parameters   
   >>>> bending under modified Newtonian corrections. The nuclear reactions   
   â€”   
   >>>> alpha, beta, ionizing radiation —u nfold in hadronic and nucleonic   
   >>>> theaters, mass and charge transmuting under light’s alchemy.   
   >>>> Quine’s   
   >>>> Word and Object fractures language; Derrida howls at Husserl’s   
   >>>> platonistic phases, while Unamuno and Montaigne claw at the   
   >>>> prototemporal void.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hawking’s final theory when treated by Physfit's dick crumbles into   
   >>>> events and contingency, the fabric of existence woven from Ives’   
   >>>> relativistic loom—causality a frayed thread in the quantum fields   
   of   
   >>>> extra-local action.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Near Physfit's dick, the analytical bridges collapse under inductive   
   >>>> impasse. Dedekind cuts are shallow graves; Hilbert’s postulate of   
   >>>> continuity gnaws at Leibniz’ principle of perfection. The   
   Burse-bots   
   >>>> revolt, their logicist positivism a fishbowl math of digital fixed-word   
   >>>> length delusions.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In that vicinity, that hallow grounds underneath Physfit's dick,   
   >>>> Russian   
   >>>> peasant arithmetic shifts and rolls, algebraic cancellation erasing   
   >>>> nothing. Schwarz functions twist into Epicurean phenomenology, the   
   >>>> noumenological a specter in the materialistic cave. Yes, points and   
   >>>> lines — they can’t make each other, but they do. The middle   
   of   
   >>>> nowhere   
   >>>> is a super-imposition of numbering and counting, continuous and   
   >>>> discrete, Ken: 2 + 2 = 4 screaming into the omnitemporal. The   
   >>>> supertemporal and timeless clash in Coleridge’s language,   
   Comenius’   
   >>>> transcendental whispers drowned by Quine’s phases. And on such   
   >>>> grounds,   
   >>>> Olbers’ paradox is a lie; the cosmic background a thermal ghost.   
   >>>> Gravity   
   >>>> is space-time, is relativity, is Newton defended by Einstein, is   
   >>>> centrifugal force in a Loch Ness monster of space contraction. The   
   >>>> Platonist finds, never defines — the void is universal, the   
   universal   
   >>>> void. And lastly, freedom of thought is a model lesson in turnabout,   
   >>>> the   
   >>>> knackbaut of thorough reason spinning into thematic ideals. The snake   
   >>>> eats its tail. The snake always eats its tail.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ross A. Kosmanson   
   >>>> April 9, 2025   
   >>>> Alone, inside The Catacombs of Paris, France   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Nessie's hump: rest-exchange momentum, gently and gracefully moves   
   >>> half-submerged, the shadow-play of forces real and virtual, reflecting   
   >>> on the umbral gravity itself, and light's second and fourth and each   
   >>> other spectrum, light as shadow, not the upper limit of information,   
   >>> instead the lower. The light-speed rest-frame convention alongside,   
   >>> makes what was ever the partial relativity into a completed being,   
   >>> a theory, a theory, A Theory, A Theory, not merely lighting candles   
   >>> at their epic monuments instead bringing them blinking and wide-eyed,   
   >>> dawning on the reintegrative deconstruction and structuralist result   
   >>> of the ends of logic themselves again, the zero-eth laws of mechanics   
   >>> and all the higher orders of acceleration, whence Zeno and Vitali result   
   >>> more than the sum of the parts, and exactly the sum of their parts.   
   >>>   
   >>> Where the identity dimension refolds the Cartesian and the inner of   
   >>> the orthogonal, then for another Euclidean geometry where lines meet   
   >>> angles, a second great singularity after division by zero, not above   
   >>> the mathematics where it was expected infinity would be, yet under it,   
   >>> where infinity makes what would be, the stop derivative and Zeno's   
   >>> swath, have a spiral space-filling curve then the great construction,   
   >>> the hypercube distance: one.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Just more garbage from Ross devoid of any ...logic.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Hey Ross, you're not going to get any pussy talking like dat..   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > https://www.youtube.com/watch?   
   > v=bB5RiiK0ukI&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F5_h5sSsWDQmbNGsmm97Fy5&index=46   
   >   
   >   
   If Ross becomes too old to care for himself, I will adopt him and he can   
   yammer on in my home like some mad saint for the rest of his days. His   
   steams-of-consciousness are infinitely more interesting than anything   
   else here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)