Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,606 of 178,769    |
|    Physfitfreak to Physfitfreak    |
|    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) (2/2)    |
|    19 Apr 25 20:39:41    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>> discover this one-week period by trial and error in settling spousal       >>> disputes or something? Does court of law do it also?       >>>       >>> For the decision my dick made to dump physics and destroy my degree,       >>> my dick gave it almost exactly one week of off and on intense       >>> thought. But that's my dick, and not everybody is a Physfit's dick.       >>>       >>> But could it be that stuff equally sensitive and consequential, all,       >>> require one week of deliberations and weighing? If you know something       >>> about it put it forward.       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>       >>       >> And this "week" itself.. :-) The notion of a "week" must've formed for       >> human for a good reason, cause it is universal. I think perhaps ages       >> ago, human found out that it takes 7 days for some difficult thoughts       >> and calculations to mature. How else could the concept of a week form?       >>       >> So it must have to do with human brain and humans found it out a long,       >> long time ago. Even when they deliberately tried to change it, it       >> never worked!.. Soviets changed it to a 10 day period for a while,       >> thinking since communism is based on their own dicks, then such       >> concepts as a week can only be based on cro-magnons' dicks.       >>       >> And it didn't work!. Week toughed out through even communism dickeries :)       >>       >> It might have to do with the amount of REM we have in 7 days of nigh       >> sleeps. Those are the hours where inputs consolidate anyway. There       >> might be an interesting study of this. I wish some Bozo here has       >> stumbled on it and can cite it.       >>       >>       >       >       > The period of a week is not based on astronomy. It is not based on 10       > either, like Modern Human number system is. And is not based on 5 like       > Roman numbers kind of follow. So it must've come from somewhere more       > meaningful than mere features of human number of fingers, etc.       >       > Time to ask DeepSeek! So fuck you muted illiterate Bozos. You little       > tribal dimwits.       >       > It says it is related to celestial bodies visible to the naked eye (Sun,       > Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn) and that Babylonians       > adopted it first for that reason.       >       > I think this is bullshit.       >       > It must've had a more useful and sensed and felt reason behind it.       >       > Is there a freely available AI that has access to, knows, and at least       > points to scientific journal contents, if not allowing them to download?       > ... Look who I'm asking this question from. A series of Bozos after       > Bozos, literally all tribal and dumb.       >       > So good luck to my dick :(       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >                     Never mind, DeepSeek was non-tribal enough to list such AIs for me,       complete with each of their strengths and limitations. Bye! :)              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca