From: jimp@gonzo.specsol.net
Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>>> On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
>>>>> you) question.
>>>>> An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
>>>>> in the position of x. The velocity of the object
>>>>> is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
>>>>> change?
>>>>> Yes or no.
>>>>
>>>> Gibberish.
>>>
>>> A dodge.
>>>
>>>> Positions have 3 coordinates.
>>>
>>> Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
>>> of 3 numbers. Whatever.
>>>
>>>> Velocity with respect to what?
>>>
>>> To the observer.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Define "space is inflating".
>>>
>>> Didn't your fellow idiots care?
>>
>> Still rambling gibberish.
>
> Still easier to wave arms and scream
> "GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.
When you actually come up with cogent question...
>
>>
>> And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
>
> But it has something to do with your
> other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
> is the first derivative of position with
> respect to time" no longer holds in
> that moronic mumble your moronic religion
> is generating.
It appears you have no understanding of calculus or simple motion. That
velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time is a
rather trivial observable.
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
