XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   The Starmaker wrote:   
   >   
   > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > >   
   > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > At Charles Darwin's time the age of the Earth was thought to be about   
   > > > > 75,000 years old.  (you won't believe how someone else came up with   
   that   
   > > > > number)   
   > > > >   
   > > > > He was in a rush to publish his book and noticed the numbers were   
   > > > > wrong...   
   > > > > ...he knew   
   > > > > eventually somebody would have   
   > > > > figured out you cannot change a fish to a man in 75,000 years.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So he, 'made up a number'!   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Then when he published his book, (origin of species 1859) he wrote the   
   > > > > age of the earth to be   
   > > > > 306,662,400 years old.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The equiptment he needed to determine the age of the earth wasn't   
   > > > > invented untill 1905 using radioactive decay.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So, he made up any number to fit the facts of his book. He lied. But   
   how   
   > > > > come nobody out there sez he lied????   
   > > > >   
   > > > > What else did Charles Darwin make up? the WHOLE book Origin of the   
   > > > > Species????   
   > > >   
   > > > "Charles Darwin Theory determines what he observes."   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > Hell, Newton came out with the age of the earth at 50,000..   
   > >   
   > > who knows how he came out with that number?   
   > >   
   > > How about that number 75,000????   
   > >   
   > > In 1779 the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of Earth   
   > > using an experiment: he created a small globe that resembled Earth in   
   > >  composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to   
   > > estimate that Earth was about 75,000 years old.   
   > >   
   > > The age of the earth is the exact number of the age of the   
   > > universe....eventually it will catch up with it.   
   > >   
   > > Somebody is holding you guys back..   
   > >   
   >   
   > Okay, if you look at the History of the age of the earth, the numbers go up   
   and up and up and up...   
   >   
   > and it stops at  4.54 billion.   
   >   
   > Why did it stop? and Why did it stop at the year 1956????   
   >   
   > Somebody is holding you guys back..you are not allowed to think...forward.   
   >   
   > Yous need permission to ..think.   
   >   
   > I don't have that problem. I already know the age of the earth is the same   
   age of the universe. It's irrefutable!   
   >   
   > In fact, look up at the Big Dipper, it's the same age of the universe.   
   >   
   > Now yous people don't realy understand Stars and it's arrangement..   
   > Yes, it is arranged as you see it.   
   >   
   > Now, this part you never heard before...   
   >   
   > every star you see has a twin..   
   > but the twin is at the other side   
   > of the universe...and that twin has a twin, and that   
   > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe..   
   > and that twin has a twin, and that   
   > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe.   
   >   
   > That's a total of 4 stars.   
   >   
   > You can actually find each twin by   
   > simply   
   > drawing a straight line and that line will reach'   
   > directly without any interferences from   
   > any other star.   
   >   
   > All stars have 4 twins.   
   >   
   > Each twin is located in the next dimension..   
   > 4 dimensions...visible dimensions.   
      
      
   All 4 stars are twins or copies of each other..   
   each one in a different dimension. You can actualy draw a   
   straight line to each one and it forms a perfect square.   
      
   All stars have a copy of itself in another dimension, and   
   there are only 4 dimensions.   
      
   Now imagine drawing billons of straight lines that form perfect   
   squares. You have billons of squares. From a far..the stard appear   
    to be scattered, but are they?   
      
   If each star has a copy of itself, in another dimension, in the   
   same 'position' of it's copy in each dimension...then   
   all stars in the universe are arranged in order.   
   In one dimension it appears scattered..but the second dimension   
   contains a mirror reflection of it's first dimension.   
   4 reflections, 4 dimensions....all connected.   
      
      
   There is a center to the 4 dimensions.   
      
   It's a star. One star. No twins.   
      
   It holds all 4 dimensions together.   
      
      
      
       The Starmaker   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,   
   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,   
   and challenge the unchallengeable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)