Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,680 of 178,769    |
|    The Starmaker to The Starmaker    |
|    Re: age of the Earth    |
|    30 Apr 25 20:47:52    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity       From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com              The Starmaker wrote:       >       > The Starmaker wrote:       > >       > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > >       > > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > > >       > > > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > > > >       > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:       > > > > > >       > > > > > > At Charles Darwin's time the age of the Earth was thought to be       about       > > > > > > 75,000 years old. (you won't believe how someone else came up       with that       > > > > > > number)       > > > > > >       > > > > > > He was in a rush to publish his book and noticed the numbers were       > > > > > > wrong...       > > > > > > ...he knew       > > > > > > eventually somebody would have       > > > > > > figured out you cannot change a fish to a man in 75,000 years.       > > > > > >       > > > > > > So he, 'made up a number'!       > > > > > >       > > > > > > Then when he published his book, (origin of species 1859) he wrote       the       > > > > > > age of the earth to be       > > > > > > 306,662,400 years old.       > > > > > >       > > > > > > The equiptment he needed to determine the age of the earth wasn't       > > > > > > invented untill 1905 using radioactive decay.       > > > > > >       > > > > > > So, he made up any number to fit the facts of his book. He lied.       But how       > > > > > > come nobody out there sez he lied????       > > > > > >       > > > > > > What else did Charles Darwin make up? the WHOLE book Origin of the       > > > > > > Species????       > > > > >       > > > > > "Charles Darwin Theory determines what he observes."       > > > > >       > > > >       > > > > Hell, Newton came out with the age of the earth at 50,000..       > > > >       > > > > who knows how he came out with that number?       > > > >       > > > > How about that number 75,000????       > > > >       > > > > In 1779 the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of       Earth       > > > > using an experiment: he created a small globe that resembled Earth in       > > > > composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to       > > > > estimate that Earth was about 75,000 years old.       > > > >       > > > > The age of the earth is the exact number of the age of the       > > > > universe....eventually it will catch up with it.       > > > >       > > > > Somebody is holding you guys back..       > > > >       > > >       > > > Okay, if you look at the History of the age of the earth, the numbers go       up and up and up and up...       > > >       > > > and it stops at 4.54 billion.       > > >       > > > Why did it stop? and Why did it stop at the year 1956????       > > >       > > > Somebody is holding you guys back..you are not allowed to        hink...forward.       > > >       > > > Yous need permission to ..think.       > > >       > > > I don't have that problem. I already know the age of the earth is the       same age of the universe. It's irrefutable!       > > >       > > > In fact, look up at the Big Dipper, it's the same age of the universe.       > > >       > > > Now yous people don't realy understand Stars and it's arrangement..       > > > Yes, it is arranged as you see it.       > > >       > > > Now, this part you never heard before...       > > >       > > > every star you see has a twin..       > > > but the twin is at the other side       > > > of the universe...and that twin has a twin, and that       > > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe..       > > > and that twin has a twin, and that       > > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe.       > > >       > > > That's a total of 4 stars.       > > >       > > > You can actually find each twin by       > > > simply       > > > drawing a straight line and that line will reach'       > > > directly without any interferences from       > > > any other star.       > > >       > > > All stars have 4 twins.       > > >       > > > Each twin is located in the next dimension..       > > > 4 dimensions...visible dimensions.       > >       > > All 4 stars are twins or copies of each other..       > > each one in a different dimension. You can actualy draw a       > > straight line to each one and it forms a perfect square.       > >       > > All stars have a copy of itself in another dimension, and       > > there are only 4 dimensions.       > >       > > Now imagine drawing billons of straight lines that form perfect       > > squares. You have billons of squares. From a far..the stard appear       > > to be scattered, but are they?       > >       > > If each star has a copy of itself, in another dimension, in the       > > same 'position' of it's copy in each dimension...then       > > all stars in the universe are arranged in order.       > > In one dimension it appears scattered..but the second dimension       > > contains a mirror reflection of it's first dimension.       > > 4 reflections, 4 dimensions....all connected.       > >       > > There is a center to the 4 dimensions.       > >       > > It's a star. One star. No twins.       > >       > > It holds all 4 dimensions together.       > >       > > The Starmaker       >       > i forgot to mention that all these stars in 4 dimensions are located       > Before the big bang.       >       > So, there isn't any fourth dimensions of time.       >       > Time didn't exist until After the big bang....t=0                                   and another thing you might not know about...                     Gravity, gravitional waves existed Before the big bang.                     Gravity then existed in a different dimension...              within the 4 dimensions but not visible to the stars in the 4       dimensions.                     (if that make any sense)              In other words, if you can see the gravitational waves, you cannot see       the stars, and visa versa.                            --       The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,       to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,       and challenge the unchallengeable.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca