home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 177,680 of 178,769   
   The Starmaker to The Starmaker   
   Re: age of the Earth   
   30 Apr 25 20:47:52   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   The Starmaker wrote:   
   >   
   > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > >   
   > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > At Charles Darwin's time the age of the Earth was thought to be   
   about   
   > > > > > > 75,000 years old.  (you won't believe how someone else came up   
   with that   
   > > > > > > number)   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > He was in a rush to publish his book and noticed the numbers were   
   > > > > > > wrong...   
   > > > > > > ...he knew   
   > > > > > > eventually somebody would have   
   > > > > > > figured out you cannot change a fish to a man in 75,000 years.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > So he, 'made up a number'!   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Then when he published his book, (origin of species 1859) he wrote   
   the   
   > > > > > > age of the earth to be   
   > > > > > > 306,662,400 years old.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > The equiptment he needed to determine the age of the earth wasn't   
   > > > > > > invented untill 1905 using radioactive decay.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > So, he made up any number to fit the facts of his book. He lied.   
   But how   
   > > > > > > come nobody out there sez he lied????   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > What else did Charles Darwin make up? the WHOLE book Origin of the   
   > > > > > > Species????   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > "Charles Darwin Theory determines what he observes."   
   > > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Hell, Newton came out with the age of the earth at 50,000..   
   > > > >   
   > > > > who knows how he came out with that number?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > How about that number 75,000????   
   > > > >   
   > > > > In 1779 the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of   
   Earth   
   > > > > using an experiment: he created a small globe that resembled Earth in   
   > > > >  composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to   
   > > > > estimate that Earth was about 75,000 years old.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The age of the earth is the exact number of the age of the   
   > > > > universe....eventually it will catch up with it.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Somebody is holding you guys back..   
   > > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Okay, if you look at the History of the age of the earth, the numbers go   
   up and up and up and up...   
   > > >   
   > > > and it stops at  4.54 billion.   
   > > >   
   > > > Why did it stop? and Why did it stop at the year 1956????   
   > > >   
   > > > Somebody is holding you guys back..you are not allowed to    
   hink...forward.   
   > > >   
   > > > Yous need permission to ..think.   
   > > >   
   > > > I don't have that problem. I already know the age of the earth is the   
   same age of the universe. It's irrefutable!   
   > > >   
   > > > In fact, look up at the Big Dipper, it's the same age of the universe.   
   > > >   
   > > > Now yous people don't realy understand Stars and it's arrangement..   
   > > > Yes, it is arranged as you see it.   
   > > >   
   > > > Now, this part you never heard before...   
   > > >   
   > > > every star you see has a twin..   
   > > > but the twin is at the other side   
   > > > of the universe...and that twin has a twin, and that   
   > > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe..   
   > > > and that twin has a twin, and that   
   > > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe.   
   > > >   
   > > > That's a total of 4 stars.   
   > > >   
   > > > You can actually find each twin by   
   > > > simply   
   > > > drawing a straight line and that line will reach'   
   > > > directly without any interferences from   
   > > > any other star.   
   > > >   
   > > > All stars have 4 twins.   
   > > >   
   > > > Each twin is located in the next dimension..   
   > > > 4 dimensions...visible dimensions.   
   > >   
   > > All 4 stars are twins or copies of each other..   
   > > each one in a different dimension. You can actualy draw a   
   > > straight line to each one and it forms a perfect square.   
   > >   
   > > All stars have a copy of itself in another dimension, and   
   > > there are only 4 dimensions.   
   > >   
   > > Now imagine drawing billons of straight lines that form perfect   
   > > squares. You have billons of squares. From a far..the stard appear   
   > >  to be scattered, but are they?   
   > >   
   > > If each star has a copy of itself, in another dimension, in the   
   > > same 'position' of it's copy in each dimension...then   
   > > all stars in the universe are arranged in order.   
   > > In one dimension it appears scattered..but the second dimension   
   > > contains a mirror reflection of it's first dimension.   
   > > 4 reflections, 4 dimensions....all connected.   
   > >   
   > > There is a center to the 4 dimensions.   
   > >   
   > > It's a star. One star. No twins.   
   > >   
   > > It holds all 4 dimensions together.   
   > >   
   > >     The Starmaker   
   >   
   > i forgot to mention that all these stars in 4 dimensions are located   
   > Before the big bang.   
   >   
   > So, there isn't any fourth dimensions of time.   
   >   
   > Time didn't exist until After the big bang....t=0   
      
      
      
      
   and another thing you might not know about...   
      
      
   Gravity, gravitional waves existed Before the big bang.   
      
      
   Gravity then existed in a different dimension...   
      
   within the 4 dimensions but not visible to the stars in the 4   
   dimensions.   
      
      
   (if that make any sense)   
      
   In other words, if you can see the gravitational waves, you cannot see   
   the stars, and visa versa.   
      
      
      
   --   
   The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,   
   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,   
   and challenge the unchallengeable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca