Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 177,687 of 178,769    |
|    Physfitfreak to Physfitfreak    |
|    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) (1/2)    |
|    01 May 25 19:25:22    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math       From: physfitfreak@gmail.com              On 5/1/25 6:54 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:       > On 5/1/25 5:31 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:       >> On 5/1/25 2:06 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:       >>> On 5/1/25 12:13 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> This coming Saturday's meeting between Iranians and Americans has       >>>> been canceled!.. No new date has been given :)       >>>>       >>>> Ahah!.. Reality is taking over bullshit's place.       >>>>       >>>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>> Ok, I think I looked into this deeply enough. I know why they have       >>> canceled the meeting. By all probability decision has come from       >>> Americans. Why? Look at the facts. Or as I always put it, step back       >>> and look at the big picture :) Yes baby, my dick is a better       >>> physicist than any of you tribal little Bozos in these three forums!       >>>       >>> Iran side in the meeting:       >>> 1- Never changes the red-lines       >>> 2- Never closes the door on negotiation       >>> 3- Constantly seeks economic gain by removal of sanctions       >>> 4- Will not get bullied       >>> 5- Will not allow lobbying for Israel       >>>       >>> So Iran's side is pretty stable and predictable. It's been the exact       >>> same thing since Trump's 2018 dumping of the agreement. Now let's       >>> take a look at Americans' side:       >>>       >>> USA side in the meeting:       >>> 1- Trump can't help himself bullying in the background       >>> 2- Great forces in Washington want lobbying for Israel       >>> 3- National Security Advisor Waltz and his men got sacked today       >>> 4- Waltz pressed lobbying for Israel       >>> 5- It is quite possible that Witkoff will take Waltz job       >>>       >>>       >>> If you look at the facts above, they will tell you why Americans       >>> postponed the meeting :) As simple as that.       >>>       >>> Need help?       >>>       >>> American government's asses are in constant exchange back and forth       >>> with their mouths. Asses are infected with Israeli lobby, mouths are       >>> at the verge of infection by the Israelis. So in an effort for one to       >>> do its job, asses have to exchange places with mouths back and forth,       >>> constantly, and perpetually.       >>>       >>> There's nothing wrong to see the mouth placed where the mouth should       >>> be. But often enough your ass is smack where the mouth should be! And       >>> your mouths taking up asshole's job.       >>>       >>> Result is, Americans are now stepping back to see how they can first       >>> remedy the unique situation they're in, before they flatter       >>> themselves with speaking with Iranians. They've felt that they're not       >>> _fit_ to do that yet.       >>>       >>> I think Trump wants to place Wikoff at Waltz' job to make the       >>> negotiation get a chance to lead to some form of agreement instead of       >>> war for USA for the sake of Israeli dicks.       >>>       >>> If Witkoff gets that job, negotiation should continue immediately.       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>       >>       >>       >> Ahah!.. The negotiations with Europeans also, which was planned for       >> tomorrow, has just been postponed!.. :-)       >>       >> Hehe :)       >>       >> European Bitches of Americans need to get their orders from their       >> masters first, to know what to negotiate on :)       >>       >> What sorry asses.. They think the world isn't watching them perhaps.       >> They must be hoping so.       >>       >>       >       >       >       > Some Arab outlets are pretending to be under the impression Iran is the       > side that postponed them. Their excuse is Iran in the presence of so       > much contradictions in USA's words (and a possible role in the explosion       > in Iran's port) sensed they were just wasting time.       >       > This is not so. As I explained, the request must've come from Americans,       > who by the way may have told Arab news outlets to point the finger at       > Iran just for the heck of it.       >       > In fact, it was the Ommanis who reported to Iran that the negotiations       > on the coming Saturday has been postponed "for reasons of logistics for       > the Ommanis themselves". This was Ommanis prudent and polite way of       > handling this. Iranians didn't know anything about it. So it must've       > come from the Americans, and for the reasons I went over above.       >       > There is some degree of _mess_ right now in USA which is funny, cause it       > has also been unavoidable; and not because the government here is       > anything more important than an entity run by baboons, but because this       > time around the ramifications will go beyond being just political. Far       > reaching economical changes are in store. China hasn't backed down, and       > they know what they're doing. So prices of material goods here will jump       > up by a factor of about 4.       >       > Military industrial complexes are reaping you off every day. Even       > dispute with India over tariffs isn't over. Who killed those 26 or so       > Hindus and whose money did that? They were no "Pakestanis".       >       > And the explosion in Iran's port?.. Somebody has been treating these old       > ancient people like they are their "Lebanon." Who is pest enough to do       > that.       >       > If India bans tech help to Americans, 3/4th of the American tech job       > positions delivered by Indians from within India suddenly gets emptied.       > Those employees were getting paid nothing that special and can find       > other jobs fast with similar pay, but Americans will have to pay 4 times       > higher salaries to replace the Indians with American techs here. So       > anything tech-related will also jump 4-fold in price if the dispute with       > India isn't resolved.       >       > Oh, you got Arabs, right? Lowering the price of oil only goes so far. It       > can't remedy a huge price jump across USA. Say, how far more can you       > raise the prices of houses here? Hehe :) Hahhahhahhahahh :-) Housing has       > already fucked people here in the ass so thoroughly that the tip of the       > billionaire's dicks have begun to show inside people's throats. Can you       > raise house prices four times more after that? Why don't you try it.       >       > So housing industry itself will lose money by a factor of 4..! Cause       > people cannot pay more than what they're paying right now. Then other       > businesses begin to suffer one by one, a chain reaction.       >       > In he middle of all this, Israeli rats are busy trying to subvert and       > impair American government's attempts to resolve the costly decades-long       > madness with Iran...       >       > You're fucked. I look at your "friends" and I learn that you're fucked.       >       > When your "friends" are Israelis who don't even know what friendship       > means outside their tribe, and when the man you chose to do the job for       > you confuses it with a poker game and cannot even control his mouth,       > what else did you morons expect? I'm not surprised by any of this.       >       >       >       >                            I just checked the existing data. China's export to USA is only 15% of       China's export to countries other than USA...              So they can kiss it goodbye for any length of time they want, and easily       make up for it by exporting a tiny bit more to other countries in the       world.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca