home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 177,725 of 178,769   
   Physfitfreak to Thomas Heger   
   Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)   
   09 May 25 12:26:58   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: physfitfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 5/9/25 1:34 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:   
   > Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:   
   > .   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could   
   >>>>> possibly   
   >>>>> have.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European   
   >>>> tribes   
   >>>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and   
   >>>> practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such   
   >>>> tribalism has been heavy.   
   >   
   > The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that   
   > an Englishman.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.   
   >>   
   >> They still are.   
   >>>   
   >>> But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?   
   >>   
   >> A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their   
   >> superiority.   
   >>>   
   >>> There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.   
   >>>   
   >>> E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.   
   >>   
   >> Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one   
   >> big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept   
   >> of tribe.   
   >   
   > No   
   >   
   > At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.   
   >   
   > It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.   
   >   
   > E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.   
   >   
   > That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.   
   >   
   >   
   > Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.   
   >   
   > To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with   
   > the population of a country is simply unacceptable.   
   >   
   > In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic   
   > tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by   
   > Germany.   
   >   
   >   
   > TH   
      
      
      
   Oh, now you go for changing the meaning of English terms to escape your   
   ass.   
      
   You and that Richard Hachel, I think, are the same person. You two smell   
   of the same shit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca