XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
From: ttt_heg@web.de
Am Dienstag000008, 08.07.2025 um 22:00 schrieb Aether Regained:
> Bertietaylor:> On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 19:43:23 +0000, Stefan Ram wrote:
>>
>>> Aether Regained wrote or quoted:
>>> | The
>>> |evidence for the positron is a lot stronger than the evidence for say
>>> |quarks.
>>
>> There is plenty of evidence for Harry Potter and his broomstick.
>
> Physical evidence is of course primary, and the evidence from cloud
> chamber tracks (under magnetic fields) is solid.
>
> Still I like this philosophical argument probably due to Dirac or
> Feynman (paraphrased):
>
> It is extremely remarkable that the electron and the proton are so
> unlike each other, and yet have EXACTLY EQUAL (and opposite) charge. The
> positron on the other hand, having the same mass as the electron, is not
> as much of a miracle as the proton. It would not be very surprising if
> the exactly equal charge of the proton is really derived from an
> embedded positron.
>
My own guess about the relation between electron and proton goes like this:
'electron' denotes the far end of a standing 'rotation wave' and
'proton' this inner turning point.
What we call 'charge' is therefore kind of a wave and an atom the entire
wave, which has certain characteristic points.
These points get certain names and we treat them as real, lasting,
material objects.
But that is actually wrong and we should regard particles as certain
timelike stable structures.
See here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wT
xBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
TH
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
