[continued from previous message]   
      
   > combined human and electronic scheme, like some "Rowhani" keep calling   
   > every one of them attending the war room from outside.   
   >   
   > A lot is being learned now, and a lot is still left to do. It is too   
   > soon to know for sure.   
   >   
   > One of the major operations against the government of Iran took about 8   
   > years to fully get investigated! .. But Iranians of today are better   
   > than those Iranians back then. An earlier enemy operation had taken 2   
   > years to completely get understood.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   Russians are insisting that they never suggested to Iran to accept the   
   "zero enrichment" condition.   
      
   And listen to this, then they proceed to repeat this, "We have always   
   suggested to Iran that the only way toward the solution is via   
   diplomatic negotiations."   
      
   So that's where the "tail of the rooster" is sticking out from   
   underneath Russia's clothing. They know what they're saying is bullshit,   
   and they keep saying it, because they have nothing but bullshit to say   
   about this matter. They're on Israel's side.   
      
   In other words, Putin is saying that he cannot do a damn thing about   
   this because interests of Israel in it is at the stake. Someone said a   
   third of Israelis are Russians. This is no joke. Or was it 2/3rd?..   
      
      
   An Indian source has mentioned that USA at this time can only produce 20   
   THAAD missiles a year, and they used up 4p THAAD missiles to knock off   
   Iranian missiles on their way to targets. So in a matter of 11 days, to   
   be exact, USA had to spend two years worth of THAAD missiles.   
      
   Iran, on the other hand, has said that right before Israelis asked to   
   stop the war, she had means left to continue this war "for about 8 years."   
      
   So if it doesn't get nuclear, Iran doesn't need Russia or anybody to win   
   the war against Israel and USA (and Europe) both, using only   
   conventional weapons. Time in such a war is strongly on Iran's side.   
      
   But I think Iran must brace for a nuclear war and be prepared for it.   
   This same Trump was advocating the use of nuclear weapons on Iraq 20   
   years back. Iran _will_ be attacked by nukes, if she does not have   
   enough deterrence.   
      
   So obstacles on the way to openly build nukes cannot last long in Iran   
   regardless of who they are who oppose it. Leader will oppose it? Leader   
   will lose trust of Iranians and will fade away. Literally all Iranians   
   are saying Iran should openly build them. Good times are over when 1100   
   Iranians give their lives for such stupidities and selfishness (or even   
   treason). Nobody can install obstacles in their ways.   
      
   Leader can go to Karbala, Iraq, and stand under the flag of Abbas and   
   swiftly get killed by an American drone, if he really chooses so. But   
   Iranians don't want to be martyrs; they are the real friends of Abbas,   
   and yes, under the flag of Abbas, trying to stay alive just like Abbas,   
   and continue his war as Abbas himself did. The times have changed. The   
   distinction between where the Leader stands and where Iranians are, is   
   now clear in the open, and therefore bullshit is over. Those loving to   
   get martyred aren't collaborators of Abbas. They are defeatists. Iran   
   cannot have that. Abbas couldn't have that either.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)