From: janburse@fastmail.fm   
      
   Hi,   
      
   Why have even a classification of code   
   into Python, JavaScript, Java, etc.. ?   
   They are just some form. Not content.   
      
   But what is content? The last 30 years   
   saw it that repository spurred   
   collaboration, because I can go home   
   forget everything and next morning,   
      
   first do a repo refresh and pick a   
   ticket and dig into something. So the   
   no code companion repository will do   
   the same, like it does now.   
      
   It will not be solely intent based.   
   Goals can be highly ambigious. I do   
   not think the future AGI based repos   
   will be intent based. They have to grasp   
      
   the full BDI, believe desire intent   
   of their users. So with a cognitive twin,   
   and some trust, I might even delegate some   
   work completely or multiply my ego a 100   
      
   times and delegate. Delegate to swarm   
   was always my dream.   
      
   Bye   
      
   Mild Shock schrieb:   
   >   
   >   
   > Hi,   
   >   
   > So StackOverflow has already fallen, and   
   > GitHub will be the next one. StackOverflow   
   > was eclectic, insuinated a high Signal   
   > quality but repelled its newcomers by   
   > strick language rules and deletism.   
   >   
   > StackOverlow is suplaned by ChatGPT, etc..   
   > They are more tolerant and can deliver   
   > excellent Signals, much beter than   
   > StackOverflow. ChatGPT and other assistants   
   > flipped the model: No downvotes.   
   >   
   > No “duplicate question” shaming. Conversational,   
   > exploratory, and often faster than Googling +   
   > scanning SO threads. Most importantly: they don’t   
   > punish incomplete knowledge, which is where   
   > most human learning happens.   
   >   
   > LLMs give a more forgiving learning curve.   
   >   
   > Bye   
   >   
   > Mild Shock schrieb:   
   >>   
   >> Henri Poincaré believed that mathematical   
   >> and scientific creativity came from a deep,   
   >> unconscious intuition that could not be   
   >>   
   >> captured by mechanical reasoning or formal   
   >> systems. He famously wrote about how insights   
   >> came not from plodding logic but from sudden   
   >>   
   >> illuminations — leaps of creative synthesis.   
   >>   
   >> But now we have generative AI — models like GPT — that:   
   >>   
   >> - produce poetry, proofs, stories, and code,   
   >>   
   >> - combine ideas in novel ways,   
   >>   
   >> - and do so by processing patterns in massive   
   >>     datasets, without conscious understanding.   
   >>   
   >> And that does seem to contradict Poincaré's belief   
   >> that true invention cannot come from automation.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)