From: wthyde1953@gmail.com   
      
   Thomas Heger wrote:   
   > Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 22:58 schrieb William Hyde:   
   >> Thomas Heger wrote:   
   >>> Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not just   
   >>>>>>>>>> scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our own eyes   
   >>>>>>>>>> proved Germany had no functionning reactors, no enrichment,   
   >>>>>>>>>> and no bombs.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American searched for   
   >>>>>>>>> them.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed one, you   
   >>>>>>>> fucking Lügner.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of purchased   
   >>>>>>> one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The Lügner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed an   
   >>>>>> atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have   
   >>>>> actually built atomic bombs.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have   
   >>>>> not been born then.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's what history and historians are for.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because   
   >>> Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> The phrase "History is written by the victors" predates Churchill's   
   >> birth by decades.   
   >>   
   >> Churchill is quoted as saying it in a movie, which apparently is seen   
   >> as a reliable source by some. To reject historians as a source and   
   >> accept movies which are avowedly fictional is well into crackpot   
   >> territory.   
   >>   
   >> Indeed it was Goring who said:   
   >>   
   >> “Der Sieger wird immer der Richter und der Besiegte stets der   
   >> Angeklagte sein,”   
   >>   
   >> Only after he lost, though.   
   >>   
   >> Churchill did frequently joke that judgement should be left to   
   >> history, "particularly as I intend to write that history myself", a   
   >> reference to his extensive output as a writer.   
   >   
   > Churchill was actually a world-class writer and wrote a novel about a   
   > massaker, in which he participated.   
      
   I have read virtually everything Churchill has written.   
      
   Except his novel, which is called "Savrola" and is about a revolution in   
   a fictional European country.  But I am pretty sure Churchill did not   
   spend a lot of time in Laurania.   
      
   He also wrote a number of short stories, which I have not read.   
      
      
   >   
   > (the so called 'Battle of Omdurman')   
      
   He wrote no book with that title in English.  This might be a   
   translation of "The River War".   
      
   >   
   > The British conducted a number of warcrimes, like killing all the   
   > wounded enemies.   
   >   
   > Churchill wrote 'The River war'   
      
   This was the book that included the battle of Omdurman. It is not a novel.   
      
     about this and won actually a nobel   
   > price for his advanture novel.   
      
      
   According to the Nobel committee, Churchill's prize was:   
      
   "for his mastery of historical and biographical description as well as   
   for brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values"   
      
   Churchill in later years deprecated his novel and advised people not to   
   read it.  The Nobel committee would not have considered it worth a nod.   
      
      
   William Hyde   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)