[continued from previous message]   
      
       Ends with a mocking non sequitur.   
      
   Conclusion: Arindam’s response is not a valid scientific rebuttal. It   
   relies on restatement, rhetorical flourishes, and misinterpretation of   
   basic physics to defend what appears to be a deeply flawed interpretation   
   of his own experimental video.   
      
      
   --   
   penninojim@yahoo.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)