891b10bf   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Brian Ehni  wrote:   
      
   > On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote   
   > (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>):   
   >   
   > > Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > Thomas Heger   wrote in   
   > > > news:mdjmj8FmebmU4@mid.individual.net:   
   > > >   
   > > > > Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not   
   > > > > > > > > > > > just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our   
   > > > > > > > > > > > own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > no enrichment, and no bombs.   
   > > > > > > > > > > sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American   
   > > > > > > > > > > searched for them.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed   
   > > > > > > > > > one, you fucking LÃπgner.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of   
   > > > > > > > > purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed   
   > > > > > > > an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have   
   > > > > > > actually built atomic bombs.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have   
   not   
   > > > > > > been born then.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > That's what history and historians are for.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because   
   > > > > Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).   
   > > > >   
   > > > > TH   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Churchill was so confident of reelection   
   > > > in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he   
   > > > never got over that rebuke.   
   > >   
   > > Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.   
   > > Being badly alcholic didn't help either.   
   > > Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.   
   > >   
   > > Jan   
   >   
   > As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill and   
   > Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.   
      
   If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.   
   All of Europe would have been for Stalin.   
   It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion.   
   We Europeans have been lucky. For a while the Americans (read FDR)   
   were so fed up with British hesitations and delaying tactics   
   that they seriously considered giving up on Europe.   
   (and doing Japan first)   
      
   You may want to have a look at   
   Nigel Hamilton, Commander In Chief: FDR's Battle with Churchill, 1943   
   (FDR at War Book 2)   
   There is also a good review of it at Amazon.   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)