XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   XPost: alt.binaries.pictures.scenic   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Maciej Wo?niak  wrote:   
      
   > On 7/17/2025 10:16 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:   
   > > Brian Ehni  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Jul 16, 2025, J. J. Lodder wrote   
   > >> (in article<1rfi9gn.1imbhyt13uwdmmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>):   
   > >>   
   > >>> Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> Thomas Heger   wrote in   
   > >>>> news:mdjmj8FmebmU4@mid.individual.net:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> Am Montag000014, 14.07.2025 um 06:23 schrieb Gronk:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> Allied armies were everywhere in occupied Germany. Not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> just scholarly consensus but the plain evidence of our   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> own eyes proved Germany had no functionning reactors,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> no enrichment, and no bombs.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> sure, they had no atomic bombs after the American   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> searched for them.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> They *never* had any atomic bombs. They never developed   
   > >>>>>>>>>> one, you fucking LÃπgner.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Perhaps they have some in total secret. They might of   
   > >>>>>>>>> purchased one or two from North Korea? Just a thought. Sigh.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> The LÃπgner Thomas Heger is saying that Nazi Germany developed   
   > >>>>>>>> an atomic bomb. It's a lie. They did not.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> There have been many rumors about Nazi Germany, that the Nazis have   
   > >>>>>>> actually built atomic bombs.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> But, I don't know, since I have not seen nothing, because I have not   
   > >>>>>>> been born then.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> That's what history and historians are for.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Historians are usually liers and were paid by Churchill, because   
   > >>>>> Churchill said, that history was written by the victors (only).   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> So, British 'history' was actually propaganda (in WWII).   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> TH   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Churchill was so confident of reelection   
   > >>>> in 1945 that he didn't bother campaigning, he   
   > >>>> never got over that rebuke.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Churchill was already beginning to dement during WWII.   
   > >>> Being badly alcholic didn't help either.   
   > >>> Fortunately whe had Roosevelt to bring things to a happy ending.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Jan   
   > >>   
   > >> As if FDR didn't have his own problems...He sat idly by while Churchill   
   and   
   > >> Stalin divvied up Europe into spheres of influence.   
   > >   
   > > If it had been up to Churchill there would have been nothing to divide.   
   > > All of Europe would have been for Stalin.   
   > > It was Roosevelt who forced the Normandy invasion   
   >   
   > For kiddies -  Churchill's alternative were Balkans.   
      
   Yes, incredibly stupid. The real motivation was fear of a real invasion.   
   The Balkans by themselves are bad enough for making real progress.   
   Even supposing the Allies could have made some headway there   
   it would have been practically impossible to cross the Alps.   
      
   Roosevelt otoh saw what needed to be done,   
   an invasion in Normandy,   
   and from there it is all nearly flat terrain   
   all the way to Berlin.   
   He fought very hard to get Churchill to see it his way.   
   Fortunately for us he won.   
      
   > Unacceptable for Stalin, obviously.   
      
   Obviously not, Stalin would have loved it very much.   
   Let the Americans and the British do useless things in the Balkans,   
   (who wants Albania?)   
   while he would have all of Europe north of the Alps to himself.   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)