XPost: sci.physics.relativity
From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
On Sun, 7 Sep 2025 14:11:40 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
wrote:
>On 9/6/2025 4:37 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:34:25 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/6/2025 9:53 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:31:10 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/4/2025 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 14:40:42 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What came first the stars or the earth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All evidence i gathered says the earth came first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All evidence i gathered says the earth came first..
>>>>>> any my evidence comes from all different levels..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The most simpliest level..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it is written, and God said, "Let there be light."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but the Light went on After there was First an Ocean on earth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comets with shit loads of water impacting the primordial Earth?
>>>>
>>>> Panspermia?
>>>
>>> It's interesting to me. Like fish spawning in a river or something.
>>
>>
>> you might as well say aliens from another planet added the water...
>
>This is too highly engineered... The fish spawning in a river or
>something, seems rather "natural"? ;^)
I don't understand what you are getting at..
Are you saying the earth looks too highly engineered, or not too
highly engineered????
Are you saying a million monkeys with a typewriter built the earth? Or
a few comets aimlessly wandering around brought all the water?
I mean, you brought up Panspermia theory, do you even know what it
means??
"...and directed panspermia suggesting intentional seeding by
intelligent beings."
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+panspermia+theory&oq=define++Panspermia
It's simple, the earth is a result of prompt engineering.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
