Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,166 of 178,769    |
|    Thomas Heger to All    |
|    Re: What came first the stars or the ear    |
|    09 Sep 25 08:35:26    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity       From: ttt_heg@web.de              Am Sonntag000007, 07.09.2025 um 10:37 schrieb Python:       > Le 07/09/2025 à 10:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :       >> Am Samstag000006, 06.09.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python:       >> ...       >>>>>> it is written, and God said, "Let there be light."       >>>>>>       >>>>>> but the Light went on After there was First an Ocean on earth.       >>>>>       >>>>> Comets with shit loads of water impacting the primordial Earth?       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> The water came out of the interior of the Earth, not from comets.       >>>>       >>>> Comets are the remains of a former planet, which exploded long ago       >>>> in a region, where today there is the asteroid belt.       >>>>       >>>> That former planet had also water upon its surface. That's why some       >>>> comets consist of water.       >>>>       >>>> But mainly the water stems from within the celestial bodies.       >>>>       >>>> We can see this effect easily in e.g. volcanoes, because the lava       >>>> contains besides of CO2 and other gases also a lot of water vapor.       >>>       >>>       >>> Again, Thomas, weird stuff that you pulled out of your ass that are       >>> partially true and mainly false.       >>>       >>> You forgot to answer to my posts on synchronization between Earth and       >>> Moon and about the ridiculous claim that cosmological maps in       >>> Astronomy does not take light propagation delays into account.       >>>       >>> How come?       >>>       >>       >> That is my personal impression of how popular cosmology seemingly       >> functions.       >       > "impression" ? "seemingly" ? You didn't check ?              Well, in part's I did.              I used a technique to analyze Einstein's text, which is applicable to       other papers, too.              For instance I had taken 'The Galactic Black Hole' and analyzed that.              I found several statements, that were in my opinion nonsense.              This is actually all over the place and has to do with how physicists       think about their own profession.              It is more like a medieval guild, which has apprentices and masters,       where non-initiated are not allowed to participate.              >       >> Therefore, I think, that nonsense is taken to the next level and I had       >> to stay away from that.       >       > Did you consider that this nonsense is something you made up by yourself ?       >              This is certainly a risk.              But I think, that I'm not as stupid as you think.              TH              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca