home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 178,169 of 178,769   
   Chris M. Thomasson to Thomas Heger   
   Re: What came first the stars or the ear   
   09 Sep 25 11:54:22   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/8/2025 11:35 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:   
   > Am Sonntag000007, 07.09.2025 um 10:37 schrieb Python:   
   >> Le 07/09/2025 à 10:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :   
   >>> Am Samstag000006, 06.09.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python:   
   >>> ...   
   >>>>>>> it is written, and God said, "Let there be light."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> but the Light went on After there was First  an Ocean on earth.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Comets with shit loads of water impacting the primordial Earth?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The water came out of the interior of the Earth, not from comets.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Comets are the remains of a former planet, which exploded long ago   
   >>>>> in a region, where today there is the asteroid belt.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That former planet had also water upon its surface. That's why some   
   >>>>> comets consist of water.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But mainly the water stems from within the celestial bodies.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> We can see this effect easily in e.g. volcanoes, because the lava   
   >>>>> contains besides of CO2 and other gases also a lot of water vapor.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Again, Thomas, weird stuff that you pulled out of your ass that are   
   >>>> partially true and mainly false.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You forgot to answer to my posts on synchronization between Earth   
   >>>> and Moon and about the ridiculous claim that cosmological maps in   
   >>>> Astronomy does not take light propagation delays into account.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How come?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> That is my personal impression of how popular cosmology seemingly   
   >>> functions.   
   >>   
   >> "impression" ? "seemingly" ? You didn't check ?   
   >   
   > Well, in part's I did.   
   >   
   > I used a technique to analyze Einstein's text, which is applicable to   
   > other papers, too.   
   >   
   > For instance I had taken 'The Galactic Black Hole' and analyzed that.   
   >   
   > I found several statements, that were in my opinion nonsense.   
   >   
   > This is actually all over the place and has to do with how physicists   
   > think about their own profession.   
   >   
   > It is more like a medieval guild, which has apprentices and masters,   
   > where non-initiated are not allowed to participate.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> Therefore, I think, that nonsense is taken to the next level and I   
   >>> had to stay away from that.   
   >>   
   >> Did you consider that this nonsense is something you made up by   
   >> yourself ?   
   >>   
   >   
   > This is certainly a risk.   
   >   
   > But I think, that I'm not as stupid as you think.   
      
   Fwiw, my n-ary field experiment can create some interesting Black Hole   
   "like" things. Here are some examples in the form of 3d models. You can   
   explore them... :^)   
      
   https://skfb.ly/pyXH6   
      
   https://skfb.ly/pzTEC   
      
   https://skfb.ly/pyP9E   
      
   https://skfb.ly/pzzE6   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca