Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,169 of 178,769    |
|    Chris M. Thomasson to Thomas Heger    |
|    Re: What came first the stars or the ear    |
|    09 Sep 25 11:54:22    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity       From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com              On 9/8/2025 11:35 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:       > Am Sonntag000007, 07.09.2025 um 10:37 schrieb Python:       >> Le 07/09/2025 à 10:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :       >>> Am Samstag000006, 06.09.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python:       >>> ...       >>>>>>> it is written, and God said, "Let there be light."       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> but the Light went on After there was First an Ocean on earth.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Comets with shit loads of water impacting the primordial Earth?       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> The water came out of the interior of the Earth, not from comets.       >>>>>       >>>>> Comets are the remains of a former planet, which exploded long ago       >>>>> in a region, where today there is the asteroid belt.       >>>>>       >>>>> That former planet had also water upon its surface. That's why some       >>>>> comets consist of water.       >>>>>       >>>>> But mainly the water stems from within the celestial bodies.       >>>>>       >>>>> We can see this effect easily in e.g. volcanoes, because the lava       >>>>> contains besides of CO2 and other gases also a lot of water vapor.       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Again, Thomas, weird stuff that you pulled out of your ass that are       >>>> partially true and mainly false.       >>>>       >>>> You forgot to answer to my posts on synchronization between Earth       >>>> and Moon and about the ridiculous claim that cosmological maps in       >>>> Astronomy does not take light propagation delays into account.       >>>>       >>>> How come?       >>>>       >>>       >>> That is my personal impression of how popular cosmology seemingly       >>> functions.       >>       >> "impression" ? "seemingly" ? You didn't check ?       >       > Well, in part's I did.       >       > I used a technique to analyze Einstein's text, which is applicable to       > other papers, too.       >       > For instance I had taken 'The Galactic Black Hole' and analyzed that.       >       > I found several statements, that were in my opinion nonsense.       >       > This is actually all over the place and has to do with how physicists       > think about their own profession.       >       > It is more like a medieval guild, which has apprentices and masters,       > where non-initiated are not allowed to participate.       >       >>       >>> Therefore, I think, that nonsense is taken to the next level and I       >>> had to stay away from that.       >>       >> Did you consider that this nonsense is something you made up by       >> yourself ?       >>       >       > This is certainly a risk.       >       > But I think, that I'm not as stupid as you think.              Fwiw, my n-ary field experiment can create some interesting Black Hole       "like" things. Here are some examples in the form of 3d models. You can       explore them... :^)              https://skfb.ly/pyXH6              https://skfb.ly/pzTEC              https://skfb.ly/pyP9E              https://skfb.ly/pzzE6              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca