XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Mittwoch000010, 10.09.2025 um 20:57 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   > Den 10.09.2025 10:40, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >> Am Montag000008, 08.09.2025 um 14:23 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:   
   >>> Den 07.09.2025 10:26, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It simply wouldn't make sense, to find patterns in stars, which do   
   >>>> not belong to the same time.   
   >>>   
   >>> Consider a star 10000 light years away.   
   >>>   
   >>> Does this star and the Sun "belong to the same time"?   
   >>   
   >> No!   
   >   
   > But we sure can "find patterns" in a star 10000 ly away.   
      
   You cannot find patterns in star configurations in a single star!!   
      
   To find patterns you need to have masses of stars in your collection.   
      
   But how do you know, whether these stars all belong to the same time?   
      
   It is actually an assumption, based on apparent connections and similar   
   red-shift (or something equivalent).   
      
   But how could we possibly know, that the distances to all the stars in a   
   collection are all the same?   
      
   More likely:   
      
   physicists/cosmologists swept the 'little' problem silently under the   
   rug and continued thinking about a starformation, that never existed.   
      
   ...   
      
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)