home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 178,203 of 178,769   
   The Starmaker to Jim Pennino   
   Re: What came first the stars or the ear   
   12 Sep 25 22:31:41   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   Jim Pennino wrote:   
   >   
   > In sci.physics The Starmaker  wrote:   
   > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:55:41 -0700, Jim Pennino   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >>In sci.physics The Starmaker  wrote:   
   > >>> Jim Pennino wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>    
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> > i meant, what is the age of our sun..   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> >   
   > >>>> > compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> 4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> >   
   > >>>> > is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> penninojim@yahoo.com   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin   
   measurement of...Time.   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >>If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this   
   > >>discussion.   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > If you understand..."by a nose" it means:   
   > >   
   > > 'by a nose'   
   > > By an extremely short or slim margin (of distance, time, or another   
   > > measure).   
   > > https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/by+a+nose   
   >   
   > And that has what to do with relativity?   
   >   
   > So you concider 27,000,000 years a short amount of time?   
   >   
   > --   
   > penninojim@yahoo.com   
      
      
   27,000,000 years is a fake number. It's a fake photo finish.   
      
   compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)   
      
   is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?   
      
   i want to see the photo finish.   
      
      
   Now, God  moved upon the face of the   
    waters of the earth and ...   
   then he 'prompt'; , Let there be light: and there was light.   
      
      
   The 'science community' is trying to move the order of events   
      
    "waters of the earth"   
   "Let there be Light"   
      
      
   to   
      
   "Let there be Light   
   "waters of the earth".   
      
      
   >> Here are clearly the 'order of events':   
   >>   
   >> 1    In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.   
   >>   
   >> 2    And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon   
   >> the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the   
   >> waters.   
   >>   
   >> 3   And God said, Let there be light: and there was light   
   >   
      
      
   I mean, I understand the goal of the 'scientific community' is to   
   assasinate God so thst the Science guys want to rewrite creation...   
   but it ain't going to work.   
      
   There is no cure for 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.'.   
      
   And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon   
   the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the   
    waters.   
   And God said, Let there be light: and there was light   
      
      
   27,000,000 years is a fake number. And they know it.   
      
   It's Hollywood accounting.   
   It's cooking the books.   
      
   Ask the Math department. They get hired by people who want ot cook books all   
   the time.   
      
      
   It is the sci.math department that comes up with tweaking 27,000,000 years to   
   keep the horse up front.   
      
      
   You have a totem pole. The Jewish people are on top of that totem pole, and   
   the rest of yous who are not Jewish are   
   under the top of the totem pole, isn't that correct???  The Jewish people are   
   on top of that totem pole, isn't that correct?   
      
   Yous are not even allowed to answer that question, let alone ...ask it.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,   
   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,   
   and challenge the unchallengeable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca