XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am Freitag000012, 12.09.2025 um 07:56 schrieb Python:   
   ...   
   >>> Your "analyze" of Einstein's text is an abysmal failure, a complete   
   >>> bunch of nonsense from start to finish.   
   >>>> For instance I had taken 'The Galactic Black Hole' and analyzed that.   
   >>   
   >> I made an English version called 'Annotated version of SRT'.   
   >>   
   >> It was a pdf of the English translation of Einstein's paper 'On the   
   >> electrodynamics of moving bodies'.   
   >>   
   >> Then I marked every questionable statement with the annotation   
   >> function of that pdf software and wrote a comment, why that was in my   
   >> view a questionable statement (and whether or not that was an error).   
   >>   
   >> I wrote more than 420 annotations.   
   >>   
   >> This actually means: the text contains a colossal number of errors of   
   >> all kinds.   
   >>   
   >> About those comments I had several discussions in this group of the   
   >> UseNet in a period of about two years.   
   >>   
   >> The comments helped me a lot to clarify my own statements and rethink   
   >> a number of comments.   
   >>   
   >> But the total number of annotation was only reduced insignificantly in   
   >> this process.   
   >>   
   >> The vast majority remained unchallenged.   
   >>   
   >> That means: there are a HUGE number of errors in this text, where the   
   >> text itself could not be defended against critique.   
   >>   
   >> This in turn would qualify Einstein's text as among the worst articles   
   >> ever printed in a scientific journal.   
   >   
   > 100% of your "comments" are idiotic garbage. You failed at understanding   
   > the most obvious basic statements.   
   >   
   > Especially about synchronization of clocks. Remember?   
      
   No, not at all.   
      
   I have criticized Einstein's method, because Einstein didn't mention any   
   means to correct the error caused by the finite speed of light and the   
   resulting delay.   
      
   This critique may eventually be wrong, even if I don't think so, but   
   it's certainly not garbage.   
      
   It is actually a possible critique, but possibly not a valid one.   
      
   If my critique ain't valid, because it's erroneous itself, then you   
   could defend Einstein and I my critique and we'll see, who 'wins'.   
      
   TH   
      
   ...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)