XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl   
      
   Python  wrote:   
      
   > Le 13/09/2025 à 14:08, Maciej Wo?niak a écrit :   
   > > On 9/13/2025 2:06 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:   
   > >> Den 12.09.2025 14:31, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:   
   > >>> On 9/12/2025 2:27 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:   
   > >>>> Den 12.09.2025 12:58, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:   
   > >>   
   > >> I had never heard anybody babbling that   
   > >> what is 1000 years for one observer may   
   > >> be easily  500 years for another one   
   > >> until I heard this idiot babble it:   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Have you ever heard of some idiot   
   > >>>>> babbling that what is 1000 years   
   > >>>>> for one observer may be easily   
   > >>>>> 500 years for another one?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>   
   > >> So:   
   > >>   
   > >>>> Not until now.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Why am I not surprised.   
   > >>> Relativity of time, time dilation, twins paradox -   
   > >>> doesn't sound familiar?   
   > >>   
   > >> Sure. They are all experimentally confirmed phenomena.   
   > >   
   > > As confirmed as angels pushing planets on crystal rings,   
   > > sure; anyway, they easily make what is 1000 years for   
   > > one observer 500 years for another one.   
   >   
   > "anything goes" is back! Nurses!!!   
      
   'Those nice young men in their clean white coats' may be better.   
      
   They may even take him away,   
      
   Jan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)