XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.california
From: shut.up@once.invalid
Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 22:41:20 -0700, Trevor
> wrote:
>
> >Nuke LA wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2025 4:45 AM, Trevor wrote:
> >> > A week ago, Retarded California wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The US Navy will fire a few naval artillery shells weighing anywhere
> >> >> from 5 pounds to 2000 pounds, inland on to a Camp Pendleton, California
> >> >> firing range in an early celebration of the US Marine Corps birthday.
> >> >>
> >> >> To ensure the safety of passing motorists, the I-5 freeway will be
> >> >> briefly closed for the same period of the average vehicle accident.
> >> >>
> >> >> The ranges are safe, the Navy has done this multiple times before, no
> >> >> freeways were closed, and there was no mention of it in the media. The
> >> >> Navy generally uses San Clemente Island for gunnery practice and
> >> >> infrequently Camp Pendleton.
> >> >>
> >> >> The horse's ass fool of a California Democrat governor Gavin Newsom,had
> >> >> a fit claiming thousands of lives are at stake and the federally funded
> >> >> freeway could not be closed. He was trolled and wrong as usual.
> >> >
> >> > How do you feel now that you've been proven spectacularly wrong?
> >> >
> >> > Launching artillery over civilians is not a safe thing. As we found out.
> >>
> >> They've been firing over the freeway for 50+ years according to Democrats.
> >> Don't you follow your own politics?
> >
> >[citation needed, but not expected]
>
> The navy has never fired into Pendleton before?
I don't know.
If they have, did they fire artillery over the freeway, have they been
doing it for 50+ years, and are The Evil Democrats claiming so?
And if so, how many times have vehicles been hit with shrapnel from
prematurely blowing shells?
I see no reason to take Nukie's word for anything.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
