Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,369 of 178,769    |
|    Mild Shock to Mild Shock    |
|    What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (    |
|    30 Nov 25 22:43:26    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity, comp.theory       From: janburse@fastmail.fm              Hi,              What if the planets in certain galaxies       form a turning machine. Maybe they do even       a BusyBeaver dance. What are the limits of              modelling in the coming age of analog computing.       Could Keppler have modelled a 3 planet system.       Can we model a 3 planet system now ?              "The corresponding series converges extremely       slowly. That is, obtaining a value of meaningful       precision requires so many terms that this       solution is of little practical use. Indeed,       in 1930, David Beloriszky calculated that if       Sundman's series were to be used for astronomical       observations, then the computations would involve       at least 10^8000000 terms"       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem              Could AlphaEvolve even find the sixth beaver.              Bye              Mild Shock schrieb:       > Hi,       >       > Well I even don't know why I came up with       > the NPM hack hypothesis. Saw something       > on youtube. Maybe they just do maintenance.       >       > In the coming age of analog computing,       > symbolic logic means nothing:       >       > “The high data-rate sense perception and       > identification abilities of the human system       > mostly bypass verbal/analytic awareness. We       > are generally conscious of a cognitive       > recognition after the fact. In this way, what       > we understand as consciousness has to be       > identified as a reflexive monitoring ability       > with quite limited application. To produce       > consciousness (artificial or otherwise) we       > are stepping down, not up.”       > ― Frank Herbert, Destination: Void       >       > The comming age of analog computing might affect       > astrophisics, like telescope image processing       > who knows what. It probably does already.       >       > Have Fun!       >       > Bye       >       > Mild Shock schrieb:       >> Hi,       >>       >> 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable       >> https://stackoverflow.com/users/855543/pointedears       >>       >> LoL       >>       >> Bye       >>       >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb:       >>> Mild Shock wrote:       >>> ^^^^^^^^^^       >>> Your real name should be there.       >>>       >>>> [...]       >>>> We prove that S(5) = 47, 176, 870 using the Coq proof       >>>> assistant. The Busy Beaver value S(n) is the maximum       >>>> number of steps that an n-state 2-symbol Turing machine       >>>> can perform from the all-zero tape before halting, [..]       >>>       >>> What is the relation of this to physics in general, and the theories of       >>> relativity in particular?       >>>       >>> If there is no relation, it does not belong there. Please do not       >>> crosspost       >>> mindlessly.       >>>       >>> F'up2 sci.physics.relativity so that the possible reason lands in the       >>> right       >>> place.       >>>       >>       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca