Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,384 of 178,769    |
|    Dawn Flood to Sylvia Else    |
|    Re: THE ONLY REAL counter to Delayed Cho    |
|    01 Dec 25 17:36:26    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.atheism       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 12/1/2025 9:18 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:       > On 01-Dec-25 2:27 am, JTEM wrote:       >> On 11/30/25 1:48 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:       >>       >>>> Okay, from THIS point of view, based on everything you have       >>>> always been taught about physics, no information is traveling       >>>> through time FOR THE PHOTONS. Only us. From our perspective       >>>> it is, from the perspective of the photon it isn't.       >>       >>> This doesn't even get close to the issue, since any paradoxes are       >>> seen in the measured outcomes, not the photons themselves.       >>       >> No. Einstein said that time is relative. It's not the same everywhere       >> for everyone and everything.       >>       >> The retrocausality is real. The cause is following the effect. But       >> only for us. Only because we have a very different perspective. But       >> it's real. Our observations are correct. It is retrocausality.       >>       >> But not for the photon. Everything is always happening at the same       >> place, at the same time. For the photon. But not us.       >>       >>       >       > Popular science media like to portray these experiments as having       > interference patterns present, or not present on screens, and arguing       > for retro causality.       >       > In reality, no interference patterns appear on screens, inter-alia,       > because there are no screens.       >       > The interference patterns are plots produced by analysing the recorded       > data, which can only be done after the data has been recorded.       >       > Sylvia.       >>       >>       >              Hi Sylvia!              As I have already pointed to JTEM (who continually ignores scientific       facts), proper time is an invariant quantity:              https://phys.libretexts.org/Courses/Skidmore_College/Introductio       _to_General_Relativity/01%3A_Special_Relativity/1.02%3A_The_Spacetime_Interval              And, so, no, time is not (completely) relative!              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca