From: janburse@fastmail.fm   
      
   Hi,   
      
   Don't you have a newsreader where you can   
   see the message source. You don't need more   
   information than Mild Shock in the message   
      
   body, you see everything in the message   
   headers. For example I see in your message:   
      
   From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn    
   Injection-Info: gwaiyur.mb-net.net; logging-data="2349822";   
   mail-complaints-to="abuse @ open-news-network.org"   
      
   So you posted from INWX GmbH? Still you   
   give advice how to format a USENET post, even   
   you are not able to see the message source,   
      
   of my posts? You can easily read off who I am.   
   Maybe get a decend news reader before you give   
   advice how to post.   
      
   Fucking 5 year old imbecil, get lost in your kindergarden.   
      
   Bye   
      
   Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb:   
   > Mild Shock wrote:   
   > ^^^^^^^^^^   
   > Please repair this.   
   >   
   >> Subject: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious   
   > hypothesis)   
   >   
   > The correct way to change the Subject is "... (was: ...)".  Then some   
   > newsreaders can automatically remove the " (was: ...)" part on composing a   
   > follow-up.   
   >   
   >> What if the planets in certain galaxies   
   >> form a turning machine.   
   >   
   > They do not.   
   >   
   > You appear to be very confused about the applicability of computer science   
   > to natural science.   
   >   
   > Also, you should learn how to post.  This was a completely new question, so   
   > you should not have posted it as a follow-up.  Also, you should not have   
   > top-posted, i.e. you should not have appended the full quotation of the   
   > previous postings; such is maybe appropriate in business communication, but   
   > not in Usenet.  It is also not appropriate to crosspost without Followup-To   
   > to *one* newsgroup set.   
   >   
   > I strongly suggest that you subscribe to news:news.announce.newusers, or   
   > consult Usenet posting guidelines on the Web to educate yourself about   
   > the communication medium that you are using here.  Lest you be killfiled   
   > rather quickly by people.   
   >   
   >> Could Keppler   
   >   
   > Johannes _Kepler_   
   >   
   >> have modelled a 3 planet system.   
   >   
   > Yes, he did, but not exactly.   
   >   
   >> Can we model a 3 planet system now ?   
   >   
   > Obviously; there are simulations of the Sol System e.g. in Universe Sandbox.   
   >   But the 3-body-problem is not about 3 planets, but more general.   
   >   
   > There is no *general* *exact* solution to this problem; just a solution for   
   > the *restricted* 3-body-problem in which one of the objects has a very large   
   > mass; the second object, e.g. a gas giant like Jupiter, has a smaller mass   
   > and is very far away from the first object; and the third object. e.g. an   
   > asteroid, has a small that is small enough to be negligible, and is   
   > comparably far away from the first and second object, respectively.   
   >   
   > And this is neglecting general-relativistic corrections that lead to an   
   > additional contribution in the precession of the perihelia (orbits are not   
   > actually ellipses, closed curves).   
   >   
   > F'up2 sci.physics   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)