XPost: comp.lang.misc, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: starmaker@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 03:00:03 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn   
    wrote:   
      
   >Paul.B.Andersen wrote:   
   >> Den 14.12.2025 19:25, skrev The Starmaker:   
   >>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde1   
   6701fab8/US1781541.pdf   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The very first statement in the application:   
   >>>>   "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly   
   >>>>    to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration"   
   >>>> is a refrigerator?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts.   
   >>>   
   >>> I understand English is your second language.   
   >   
   >LOL; it's the proverbial pot calling the kettle black:   
   >   
   >>> Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in   
   >>> Capitol letters   
   >   
   >in _capital_ (uppercase) letters   
   >   
   >[The Capitol is a building in Washington, D.C., the capitol (primary city)   
   >of the U.S.A., instead.]   
   >   
   >>>    REFRIDERATION       (meaning all caps)   
   >   
   >No, it reads (correctly) _REFRIGERATION_.   
   >   
   >  [If would be just a typo on "The Starmaker"'s part, it would be a very   
   >   strange one: on a U.S. keyboard layout, the key for "D" is two keys away   
   >   from that for "G".  So much for "English as second language".]   
   >   
   >>>   REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine.   
   >   
   >From this repetition of the mistake we can surmise that it was not just a   
   >typo by "The Starmaker", but that it is due to a missing ability to read or   
   >write properly.  They might be dyslexic; but then it would be hilarious that   
   >they would lecture others about language.   
   >   
   >> You are right!   
   >> "An apparatus for producing refrigeration"   
   >> does not produce a machine.   
   >>   
   >> It _is_ a machine which is called a refrigerator.   
   >   
   >Exactly.  The patent application begins with   
   >   
   >| Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly to an   
   >| apparatus and method for producing refrigeration [...]   
   >   
   >(So much for "The Starmaker"'s understanding of English.)   
   >   
   >It is interesting to note that Einstein and Szilárd are called "ASSIGNORS TO   
   >ELECTROLUX SERVEL CORPORATION, of NEW YORK, N.Y., A. CORPORATION OF   
   >DELAWARE" there already.  (You mentioned that the refrigerator that was used   
   >in your parent's home was manufactured by Electrolux and based on this   
   design.)   
   >   
   >Also: "Application filed December 16, 1927, Serial No. 240,566 [in the   
   >U.S.A.], and in Germany December 16, 1926."   
   >   
   >F'up2 sci.physics   
      
      
      
   The speling police in back in town!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)