Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,503 of 178,769    |
|    Paul.B.Andersen to All    |
|    Re: parallel random-access machine (para    |
|    16 Dec 25 22:58:35    |
      XPost: comp.lang.misc, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math       From: relativity@paulba.no              Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:       > Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:       >>       >> Do you never read the posts you are responding to?       >>       >> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company       >> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.       >>       >> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought       >> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.       >>       >> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges       >> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.       >       >       > No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.       >       > Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.       >       > Sure!       >       > But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were       > based upon Einstein's patent?       >       > My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.              Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?              >       > So, we have a few facts:       >       > Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge       > Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money       > Electrolux sold tons of fridges              ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.              >       > But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's       > and Szillard's patent?              The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of       other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with       no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:               https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670       fab8/US1781541.pdf              The refigerator is described in detail.              Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?              No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator       and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.              >       > You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money.       >       > But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company       > would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents.       >              So why do you think that Electrolux gave Einstein money?              --       Paul              https://paulba.no/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca