home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 178,503 of 178,769   
   Paul.B.Andersen to All   
   Re: parallel random-access machine (para   
   16 Dec 25 22:58:35   
   
   XPost: comp.lang.misc, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math   
   From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   > Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:   
   >>   
   >> Do you never read the posts you are responding to?   
   >>   
   >> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company   
   >> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.   
   >>   
   >> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought   
   >> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.   
   >>   
   >> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges   
   >> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.   
   >   
   >   
   > No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.   
   >   
   > Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.   
   >   
   > Sure!   
   >   
   > But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were   
   > based upon Einstein's patent?   
   >   
   > My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.   
      
   Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?   
      
   >   
   > So, we have a few facts:   
   >   
   > Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge   
   > Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money   
   > Electrolux sold tons of fridges   
      
   ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.   
      
   >   
   > But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's   
   > and Szillard's patent?   
      
   The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of   
   other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with   
   no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:   
      
     https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670   
   fab8/US1781541.pdf   
      
   The refigerator is described in detail.   
      
   Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?   
      
   No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator   
   and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.   
      
   >   
   > You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money.   
   >   
   > But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company   
   > would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents.   
   >   
      
   So why do you think that Electrolux gave Einstein money?   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca