Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,507 of 178,769    |
|    Paul.B.Andersen to All    |
|    Re: parallel random-access machine (para    |
|    17 Dec 25 14:00:00    |
      XPost: sci.physics.relativity       From: relativity@paulba.no              Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger:       > Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:       >> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:       >>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:       >>>>       >>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to?       >>>>       >>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company       >>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.       >>>>       >>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought       >>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.       >>>>       >>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges       >>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.       >>>       >>>       >>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.       >>>       >>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.       >>>       >>> Sure!       >>>       >>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were       >>> based upon Einstein's patent?       >>>       >>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.       >>       >> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?       >       >       > This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.       >       > I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this       > fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.       >       > Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.       >       > But that's all we could safely assume.       >       > Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but       > wanted to keep that secret.       >       > But how could we today possibly know????       >       >       >>>       >>> So, we have a few facts:       >>>       >>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge       >>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money       >>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges       >>       >> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.              >>>       >>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and       Szillard's patent?       >>       >> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of       >> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with       >> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:       >>       >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176       01fab8/US1781541.pdf       >>       >> The refrigerator is described in detail.       >>       >> Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?       >>       >> No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator       >> and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.              > Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part       > needed for a fast breeding reactor???              You didn't answer my question.              The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail       in the patent application.               https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670       fab8/US1781541.pdf              This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand.       An engineer should be qualified to read it.              Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is?               > > We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's       > patent and check whether or not it cools.>       > But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering       > students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did       > NOT cool.       >       > Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast       > breeding reactors.              SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL              >       > The endresult:       >       > two points for fast breeding reactor       >       > zero points for 'fridge'.       >              Can you point out where in the detailed description it       is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor?               https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670       fab8/US1781541.pdf              The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to       the relevant section.              --       Paul              https://paulba.no/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca