home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 178,507 of 178,769   
   Paul.B.Andersen to All   
   Re: parallel random-access machine (para   
   17 Dec 25 14:00:00   
   
   XPost: sci.physics.relativity   
   From: relativity@paulba.no   
      
   Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   > Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:   
   >> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:   
   >>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company   
   >>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought   
   >>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges   
   >>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'.   
   >>>   
   >>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sure!   
   >>>   
   >>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were   
   >>> based upon Einstein's patent?   
   >>>   
   >>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared.   
   >>   
   >> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality?   
   >   
   >   
   > This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'.   
   >   
   > I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this   
   > fridge was build according to Einstein's patent.   
   >   
   > Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money.   
   >   
   > But that's all we could safely assume.   
   >   
   > Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but   
   > wanted to keep that secret.   
   >   
   > But how could we today possibly know????   
   >   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> So, we have a few facts:   
   >>>   
   >>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge   
   >>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money   
   >>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges   
   >>   
   >> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent.   
      
   >>>   
   >>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and   
   Szillard's patent?   
   >>   
   >> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of   
   >> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with   
   >> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:   
   >>   
   >>  https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176   
   01fab8/US1781541.pdf   
   >>   
   >> The refrigerator is described in detail.   
   >>   
   >> Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read?   
   >>   
   >> No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator   
   >> and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator.   
      
   > Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part   
   > needed for a fast breeding reactor???   
      
   You didn't answer my question.   
      
   The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail   
   in the patent application.   
      
     https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670   
   fab8/US1781541.pdf   
      
   This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand.   
   An engineer should be qualified to read it.   
      
   Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is?   
      
    > > We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's   
   > patent and check whether or not it cools.>   
   > But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering   
   > students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did   
   > NOT cool.   
   >   
   > Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast   
   > breeding reactors.   
      
   SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL   
      
   >   
   > The endresult:   
   >   
   > two points for fast breeding reactor   
   >   
   > zero points for 'fridge'.   
   >   
      
   Can you point out where in the detailed description it   
   is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor?   
      
     https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde17670   
   fab8/US1781541.pdf   
      
   The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to   
   the relevant section.   
      
   --   
   Paul   
      
   https://paulba.no/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca