XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math, alt.atheism
From: PointedEars@web.de
jojo wrote:
> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> This newsgroup is supposed to be
>> "Einstein's theory of relativity",
>> not
>> "theory of Einstein's relatives".
>>
>>
>> Here it's for an account of rest-exchange-momentum
>> and a light-speed-rest-frame inversion of the usual
>> terms so that the frame is moving instead of at rest
>> since in Einstein's theory "motion is relative".
>>
>> I.e., the frame is both moving frame and rest frame.
>>
>>
>> Also the entire stack of derivations gets involved
>> about real analysis besides the usual Eulerian-Gaussian
>> after de Moivre since analyticity needs be made whole
>> and as for singular and original analysis, inward,
>> besides complex analysis, outward, and for the whole
>> extra-standard mathematics involved, and about the
>> entire stack of derivations of the severe abstraction
>> the mechanical reduction or the Lagrangian, and about
>> Levi-Civita "the indefiniteness of ds^2" the infinitesimal's
>> "the indefiniteness of ds".
>>
>> Yeah, it's pretty simple after that, then why kinetics
>> and kinematics needs get all involved the rotational
>> setting and the "formally un-linear", for a potentialistic
>> theory and sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials.
>>
>>
>> Notions of the Supreme and Ineffable then are their own,
>> which makes some demands of the idealistic and analytical
>> traditions to make a continuous whole again, since
>> neo-Aristotleans and neo-Hegelians and neo-Einsteinians
>> are baseless quasi-modal partial subjectivists.
>
> what are you talking about?
I doubt that even they know that. The text above contains scientific terms
(and names of scientists), but is bereft of any (scientific) meaning.
See also:
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
