Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,614 of 178,769    |
|    Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram    |
|    Re: A Derivation of Faraday's law from C    |
|    20 Jan 26 14:39:35    |
      From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de              ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote or quoted:       >The back-reaction of the second coil on the power follows from Ohm's       >law and Maxwell's equations, but not from Faraday's law alone.               It may be instructive to say that Maxwell's laws              Gauss's law (electricity): div E = rho / epsilon_0              Gauss's law (magnetism): div B = 0              Faraday's law: curl E = - dB/dt              Ampere-Maxwell law: curl B = mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt               can be written as just              d F = 0, d *F = J               after E and B are united to the two-form F (d being the exterior        differential, * the Hodge dual, and J the current 3-Form).               Even if one is not familiar with the exterior differential, this        show the unity of Maxwell's equations. They are just one single        law. So, this might make it clear that while "Faray's law" was        found before Maxwell's equations historically, one cannot actually        just split Faraday's law away and consider it in isolation always.               (I'm kinda tempted to define an operator "D" as the pairing        (d,d*) and a pairing j as (0,J) and then write "DF=j". Well,        you can see it this way, but that's my non-standard notation.)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca