Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics    |    Physical laws, properties, etc.    |    178,769 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 178,751 of 178,769    |
|    Taskfreak to Taskfreak    |
|    Re: "Intercept" THIS :-)    |
|    17 Feb 26 19:37:03    |
      From: taskfreak@gmail.com              On 2/9/26 8:19 PM, Taskfreak wrote:       > On 2/8/26 12:47 PM, Taskfreak wrote:       >> On 2/8/26 12:36 PM, Taskfreak wrote:       >>> On 2/7/26 5:20 PM, Taskfreak wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> https://i.postimg.cc/YSHGPvRs/Khorramshahr-4.jpg       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Hehe :)       >>>>       >>>>       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>> Iran's military has just found one of the American bunker buster 14       >>> ton bombs that were dropped last June in Iran has failed to go off.       >>> Scientists are now struggling to have the military move the       >>> unexploded ordinance to their labs for reverse engineering :-)       >>>       >>> Hehe :)       >>>       >>> If you found a piece of news later that said Iran has made a special       >>> missile that can carry a 15 or so tons payload, you know what that       >>> will mean.       >>>       >>>       >>       >>       >> This was by the way disclosed by Iran's foreign minister himself. This       >> is how it looks like:       >>       >> https://i.postimg.cc/MKb1Z1Tq/bunker-buster.jpg       >>       >> I know why Araghchi revealed this. I see no other reason for it. He is       >> probably indirectly telling Israelis their nuclear industries will       >> soon be reachable, then toast :-)       >>       >> Hehehehe :)       >>       >>       >       >       > But that would require a HUGE rocket, going straight above into space,       > then coming back down just as Earth's rotation places Israel smack       > underneath, so the least amount of fuel would be needed for such an       > unusually heavy payload. A one-use type of weapon. Made for Israel :)       >       > Iran, by the way, has developed (and tested) ICBM type also. Tests were       > done on them launching from a distant point in Iran and coming down on       > northern Siberia. The orbits they tried were rather similar to orbits       > from north Siberia to the United States. And they are for now stationed       > in Northern Siberia in case of USA doing something out of proportion to       > Iran. These orbits pass over Greenland and Canada both, but mainly       > Greenland :) So Trump must've become aware of such missiles in the       > northern Siberia, belonging and under the control of Iranians, shortly       > before he began thinking about Greenland (and Canada). Hehe :)       >       > Russians by all probability voluntarily helped Iranians on that       > particular form of project, much in contrast to their extreme       > unwillingness in helping Iran against Israel. They even secretly help       > Israel against Iran. Definitely at least in intelligence gathering.       >       > And since it wouldn't make much sense to build ICBMs for conventional       > payloads, these Iranian ones must be all ready to carry nuclear bombs.       >       > Since they're long-range, European countries can also become targets for       > them, should that day arrive. For Iran, these ICBMs are a must to have       > for survival. Without them USA would've certainly used nukes against Iran.       >       > So none of you Bitch countries and your boss, USA, can nuke Iran. You       > can only lick those thousands of nukes you have, for now.       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >                     Iran's leader today in a live speech broadcast in front of a large       number of people said this:               "A U.S. warship is a very dangerous piece of equipment. But       something that can send it down to the depths of the ocean is more       dangerous!"              Hahhahahhh :-)) Well said, old man :)              He was probably referring to the Hoot. None of these ships are safe       against Hoots. There's simply no defense against Hoots. Look that up :)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca