home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics      Physical laws, properties, etc.      178,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 178,751 of 178,769   
   Taskfreak to Taskfreak   
   Re: "Intercept" THIS :-)   
   17 Feb 26 19:37:03   
   
   From: taskfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/9/26 8:19 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   > On 2/8/26 12:47 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >> On 2/8/26 12:36 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >>> On 2/7/26 5:20 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://i.postimg.cc/YSHGPvRs/Khorramshahr-4.jpg   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hehe :)   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Iran's military has just found one of the American bunker buster 14   
   >>> ton bombs that were dropped last June in Iran has failed to go off.   
   >>> Scientists are now struggling to have the military move the   
   >>> unexploded ordinance to their labs for reverse engineering :-)   
   >>>   
   >>> Hehe :)   
   >>>   
   >>> If you found a piece of news later that said Iran has made a special   
   >>> missile that can carry a 15 or so tons payload, you know what that   
   >>> will mean.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> This was by the way disclosed by Iran's foreign minister himself. This   
   >> is how it looks like:   
   >>   
   >> https://i.postimg.cc/MKb1Z1Tq/bunker-buster.jpg   
   >>   
   >> I know why Araghchi revealed this. I see no other reason for it. He is   
   >> probably indirectly telling Israelis their nuclear industries will   
   >> soon be reachable, then toast :-)   
   >>   
   >> Hehehehe :)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > But that would require a HUGE rocket, going straight above into space,   
   > then coming back down just as Earth's rotation places Israel smack   
   > underneath, so the least amount of fuel would be needed for such an   
   > unusually heavy payload. A one-use type of weapon. Made for Israel :)   
   >   
   > Iran, by the way, has developed (and tested) ICBM type also. Tests were   
   > done on them launching from a distant point in Iran and coming down on   
   > northern Siberia. The orbits they tried were rather similar to orbits   
   > from north Siberia to the United States. And they are for now stationed   
   > in Northern Siberia in case of USA doing something out of proportion to   
   > Iran. These orbits pass over Greenland and Canada both, but mainly   
   > Greenland :) So Trump must've become aware of such missiles in the   
   > northern Siberia, belonging and under the control of Iranians, shortly   
   > before he began thinking about Greenland (and Canada). Hehe :)   
   >   
   > Russians by all probability voluntarily helped Iranians on that   
   > particular form of project, much in contrast to their extreme   
   > unwillingness in helping Iran against Israel. They even secretly help   
   > Israel against Iran. Definitely at least in intelligence gathering.   
   >   
   > And since it wouldn't make much sense to build ICBMs for conventional   
   > payloads, these Iranian ones must be all ready to carry nuclear bombs.   
   >   
   > Since they're long-range, European countries can also become targets for   
   > them, should that day arrive. For Iran, these ICBMs are a must to have   
   > for survival. Without them USA would've certainly used nukes against Iran.   
   >   
   > So none of you Bitch countries and your boss, USA, can nuke Iran. You   
   > can only lick those thousands of nukes you have, for now.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   Iran's leader today in a live speech broadcast in front of a large   
   number of people said this:   
      
       "A U.S. warship is a very dangerous piece of equipment. But   
   something that can send it down to the depths of the ocean is more   
   dangerous!"   
      
   Hahhahahhh :-)) Well said, old man :)   
      
   He was probably referring to the Hoot. None of these ships are safe   
   against Hoots. There's simply no defense against Hoots. Look that up :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca