From: taskfreak@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/17/26 7:37 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   > On 2/9/26 8:19 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >> On 2/8/26 12:47 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >>> On 2/8/26 12:36 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/7/26 5:20 PM, Taskfreak wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/YSHGPvRs/Khorramshahr-4.jpg   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Hehe :)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Iran's military has just found one of the American bunker buster 14   
   >>>> ton bombs that were dropped last June in Iran has failed to go off.   
   >>>> Scientists are now struggling to have the military move the   
   >>>> unexploded ordinance to their labs for reverse engineering :-)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hehe :)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you found a piece of news later that said Iran has made a special   
   >>>> missile that can carry a 15 or so tons payload, you know what that   
   >>>> will mean.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> This was by the way disclosed by Iran's foreign minister himself.   
   >>> This is how it looks like:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://i.postimg.cc/MKb1Z1Tq/bunker-buster.jpg   
   >>>   
   >>> I know why Araghchi revealed this. I see no other reason for it. He   
   >>> is probably indirectly telling Israelis their nuclear industries will   
   >>> soon be reachable, then toast :-)   
   >>>   
   >>> Hehehehe :)   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> But that would require a HUGE rocket, going straight above into space,   
   >> then coming back down just as Earth's rotation places Israel smack   
   >> underneath, so the least amount of fuel would be needed for such an   
   >> unusually heavy payload. A one-use type of weapon. Made for Israel :)   
   >>   
   >> Iran, by the way, has developed (and tested) ICBM type also. Tests   
   >> were done on them launching from a distant point in Iran and coming   
   >> down on northern Siberia. The orbits they tried were rather similar to   
   >> orbits from north Siberia to the United States. And they are for now   
   >> stationed in Northern Siberia in case of USA doing something out of   
   >> proportion to Iran. These orbits pass over Greenland and Canada both,   
   >> but mainly Greenland :) So Trump must've become aware of such missiles   
   >> in the northern Siberia, belonging and under the control of Iranians,   
   >> shortly before he began thinking about Greenland (and Canada). Hehe :)   
   >>   
   >> Russians by all probability voluntarily helped Iranians on that   
   >> particular form of project, much in contrast to their extreme   
   >> unwillingness in helping Iran against Israel. They even secretly help   
   >> Israel against Iran. Definitely at least in intelligence gathering.   
   >>   
   >> And since it wouldn't make much sense to build ICBMs for conventional   
   >> payloads, these Iranian ones must be all ready to carry nuclear bombs.   
   >>   
   >> Since they're long-range, European countries can also become targets   
   >> for them, should that day arrive. For Iran, these ICBMs are a must to   
   >> have for survival. Without them USA would've certainly used nukes   
   >> against Iran.   
   >>   
   >> So none of you Bitch countries and your boss, USA, can nuke Iran. You   
   >> can only lick those thousands of nukes you have, for now.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > Iran's leader today in a live speech broadcast in front of a large   
   > number of people said this:   
   >   
   >     "A U.S. warship is a very dangerous piece of equipment. But   
   > something that can send it down to the depths of the ocean is more   
   > dangerous!"   
   >   
   > Hahhahahhh :-)) Well said, old man :)   
   >   
   > He was probably referring to the Hoot. None of these ships are safe   
   > against Hoots. There's simply no defense against Hoots. Look that up :)   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   There was another thing about that speech that's worth mentioning. Right   
   behind an above him, a large banner was held against the wall with a   
   piece of calligraphy in the style of 9th century Iran written on it. The   
   words were in Arabic, a quote from Quran (in a paragraph in Baghareh,   
   194th Ayeh). It translates to:   
      
       "So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that   
   he has assaulted you."   
      
   This, I think, carries two significant messages. One is that of course   
   when hit, Iran _will_ hit back at U.S. possessions in the region. So   
   here the leader had one more time emphasized this decision of his. It   
   will be a very messy war! The second significant message in it is more   
   ominous. I think it points to a nuclear scenario, in which the USA's   
   nuclear attack on Iran (to make things less expensive) will be responded   
   with nuclear attack by Iran, on the USA. I mentioned earlier the   
   existence of Iranian ICBM stationed in Northern Siberia. I think he has   
   ordered the commanders to hit mainland USA by those nukes right after   
   Iran is hit by nukes. "... the same way"!   
      
   So watch out. He isn't bullshitting. He never bullshits. This thing,   
   should you get cute, can cost you dearly. So forget the "cheapest way"   
   scenario crap. It won't be cheap. It will be the most expensive.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)