Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    seattle.politics    |    Whats happening in the land of Nirvana    |    102,158 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 100,222 of 102,158    |
|    Mittens Romney to Ed P    |
|    Re: Kamala's stupid "TAX THE BILLIONAIRE    |
|    02 Oct 24 09:38:05    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns, or.politics       XPost: alt.home.repair, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: robberbaron@invalid.ut              Ed P wrote:              > Interesting numbers but they don't tell the whole story.       >       > Should a widow living on $800 a month SS pay more so the top 1% can pay       > less?              The disparity in revenues in question is so extreme that none of that       demographic can impact the truly rich or their "share" in the slightest.              You know this Edie P, you lying leftard trash.              > Should the top 1% give more of their corporate profits to workers in       > higher wages so they can pay more taxes?              Should you or I determine the age scale and benefits for any viable free       market business?              You marxist toadie.                     > Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, earns around $7.99 million per hour.       > This is based on his net worth increasing by $70 billion in 2023, from       > $107 billion to $177 billion. Bezos's wealth growth is largely due to       > the value of Amazon stock, which he owns around 9% of.              And so?              He built a major supply chain monster!              Try not to act like the jealous old sot you are.              > How Much Does Elon Musk Make an Hour. The quick answer—Elon Musk makes       > around $1.6 million per hour. This is based on his net worth that rose       > by $143.9 billion in the past decade until early 2023. That's 220,690       > times the federal minimum wage              And both men are supporting the only viable space program we have now       that Obama killed off NASA, oh well...              https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/322918-how-ba       ack-obama-ruined-nasa-space-exploration/              it is useful to look back on how profoundly and adroitly President       Barack Obama crippled the space agency’s efforts to send astronauts       beyond low Earth orbit. When Obama came into office, he did what a       number of other presidents have done to determine their goals for NASA:       he formed a presidential commission to study the space agency and come       up with some recommendations.              The Augustine Commission, so named after its chairman former Lockheed       Martin CEO Norm Augustine, returned with a set of recommendations some       months later. The commission found that the program then in existence,       Project Constellation, was not executable under any reasonable budget.       The program, started by President George W. Bush, had been underfunded       and had faced technical challenges for years. The commissions offered       two alternatives. The first was Moon First, which would have focused       America’s efforts on a return to the moon. The second was Flexible Path,       which would have sent American astronauts to every destination besides       the moon—the asteroids, the moons of Mars, and so on. Both options would       lead to the holy grail of space exploration enthusiasts, a mission to Mars.              The kicker was that both options would cost an extra $3 billion a year       for NASA to execute. For the Obama administration, which was not shy       about spending money in areas that it cared about, this price tag was       too dear to bear.              The government’s response was formulated in secret. The results of these       private deliberations were rolled out in the 2011 budget request that       was released in February 2010. Project Constellation would be canceled,       root and branch. Instead, NASA would conduct studies of heavy-lift       rockets, deep-space propulsion, and other technologies that it was said,       in the fullness of time, would make exploring space cheaper and easier.              Congress, which had not been consulted, reacted with bipartisan fury.       The Obama administration made two critical errors. It had not consulted       with Congress or anyone else when it developed its plans to kill       Constellation. The White House also blatantly pulled a bureaucratic       dodge that was apparent even to a first-term member of the House from       the sticks. To kill a popular program, one studies it to death. Nowhere       in the Obama plan was there a commitment to send astronauts anywhere.       Clearly, the White House had no intention of doing space exploration.       President Obama had expressed an antipathy to American exceptionalism,       and nothing speaks to that quality than American astronauts exploring       other worlds.              When Neil Armstrong, the first man on the moon, Gene Cernan, the last       man on the Moon, and Jim Lovell, the hero of Apollo 13, sent an open       letter condemning the cancellation of Constellation, President Obama       knew he had a problem on his hands. So, with Apollo astronaut Buzz       Aldrin in tow as a political prop, Obama went down to the Kennedy Space       Center to make his big space announcement. We would go to Mars, sometime       in the next 30 years and visit an Earth-approaching asteroid before       that. We would not go back to the moon because we had already been there.              --       ⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca