XPost: alt.economics, or.politics, ca.politics   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, rec.aviation.military   
   From: smharding@verizon.net   
      
   On 3/27/25 6:52 PM, a425couple wrote:   
   > from   
   > https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-   
   > predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/   
   > articleshow/119533999.cms?from=mdr   
   >   
   > Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here   
   > is why   
   > SECTIONSBill Gates predi ..   
   >   
   > Read more at:   
   > https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-   
   > predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/   
   > articleshow/119533999.cms?   
   > utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst   
   >   
   > The Three Jobs AI Can’t Replace (Yet)   
   > 1. Coders: The Architects of AI   
   > Ironically, the people building AI systems are the ones most likely to   
   > keep their jobs. While AI has made significant strides in generating   
   > code, it still lacks the precision and problem-solving skills needed to   
   > create complex software. Gates believes human programmers will remain   
   > essential for debugging, refining, and advancing AI itself.   
   >   
   > 2. Energy Experts: The Guardians of Power   
   > The energy sector is too vast and intricate for AI to manage alone.   
   > Whether dealing with oil, nuclear power, or renewables, industry experts   
   > are required to navigate regulatory landscapes, strategize sustainable   
   > solutions, and handle the unpredictable nature of global energy demands.   
   >   
   > 3. Biologists: The Explorers of Life   
   > Biologists, particularly in medical research and scientific discovery,   
   > rely on creativity, intuition, and critical thinking—qualities AI still   
   > struggles to replicate. While AI can analyze massive datasets and aid in   
   > diagnosing diseases, it lacks the ability to formulate groundbreaking   
   > hypotheses or make intuitive leaps in research.   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, he may be smart, but I think it will be a long, long time   
   > before AI can or will reduce much employment in law enforcement.   
      
   A lot of what AI will do will be dependent on what people allow it to do.   
      
   I once did a paper on computers and the law asking a lawyer, judge,   
   state trooper and social worker how a computer might affect their   
   fields.  Most interesting was the judge's response.   
      
   I told him computers don't have emotions or prejudices and can already   
   do things quite competently in the legal field.  Case based programs   
   handle legal questions that depend on stare decisis (precedent) quite   
   well.  Such legal questions as in copyright or patent law.  Why not   
   criminal law?  No prejudice against the defendant; no variation in   
   sentence given circumstances, etc.   
      
   The judge simply said humans would not accept being judged by a   
   computer.  Humans want to be judged by humans.  Whether the computer is   
   competent in the law becomes largely irrelevant.  People would not   
   tolerate it!   
      
   Interesting thoughts.   
      
      
   SMH   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)