XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, ca.politics   
   XPost: fl.politics, rec.aviation.military   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   =?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= wrote in   
   news:m575liF9k3iU1@mid.individual.net:   
      
   > Baxter wrote:   
   >> =?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= wrote in   
   >> news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>   
   >>> pothead wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins wrote:   
   >>>>> "a425couple" wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:   
   >>>>>> 'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala   
   >>>>>> Harris during 2024 vote'   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ----------------------------   
   >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows what   
   >>>>> the Dem leaders really think of their followers.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> True.   
   >>>> Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and   
   >>>> couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.   
   >>>> The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for decades.   
   >>>> Fortunately the people have finally realized this which is why their   
   >>>> party is circling the drain.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that   
   >>> they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million scoops   
   >>> laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are   
   >>> told and a Democrat can't help his party.   
   >>   
   >> Name names, give details.   
   >   
   > They invoke names like Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi etc. on phone   
   > messages from various phone numbers.   
   >   
   > Once they talked about Trump having just held a rally and Democratic   
   > leaders were in uproar about what he said. I then looked all through   
   > the news and there was nothing about a Trump rally or the 'horrid'   
   > things he called Democrats.   
   >   
   > Other times they say how they just need a few more donations to seal   
   the   
   > win and then next day you view the loss.   
   >   
   > In the case of the April 1st elections, they claimed that some   
   donations   
   > would get us the seats and I come to the polls and there's a huge   
   margin   
   > Democrat loss.   
   >   
   > There is no transparency after the donation. This is why I can't show   
   > you some satellite photos of Democrats misusing the money or records to   
   > the effect.   
   >   
   > I named names and gave some details. Therefore, Baxter, I do not   
   expect   
   > your next response to be filled with rebuke, such as Shark335 invokes   
   > any time he is questioned.   
      
   Who is "they"? You haven't actually cited ANY details.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|