XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, ca.politics   
   From: maximusheadroom@gmx.com   
      
   In news:A2DLP.2670135$TBhc.2171956@fx16.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza   
    typed:   
      
   > On every date, Max the Magnificent typed:   
   >> In news:XnsB2C2853B550C9629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Dolman   
   >>  typed:   
   >>> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >>> news:vtlt3t$3vodg$2@dont-email.me:   
   >>>> In news:XnsB2C1D3E922ABD629555@185.151.15.160, Mitchell Holman   
   >>>>  typed:   
   >>>>> pothead  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:vtk5ut$2a9sb$2@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>> On 2025-04-14, Skeeter OG  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
      
   >>>>>>>>      Trump has consistently claimed   
   >>>>>>>> he paid Stormy $130,000 to NOT have   
   >>>>>>>> sex with him.   
      
   >>>>>>>>      And Trump cultists like Pothead   
   >>>>>>>> and Scooter and BLM actually believe   
   >>>>>>>> that.   
      
   >>>>>>>>      Amazing...............   
      
   >>>>>>> He never said that.   
      
   >>>>>> Hollow is grasping once again.   
   >>>>>> I've expressed my opinion before which is I don't give a hoot.   
      
   >>>>>     Of course you don't.   
      
   >>>>>     Hunter Biden broke the law? Prosecute!   
   >>>>>     Bob Menedez broke the law? Prosecute!   
   >>>>>     Anthony Weiner broke the law? Prosecute!   
   >>>>>     Trump broke the law? Who cares?   
      
   >>>> Vis a vis Daniels... what law did he break?   
      
   >>> Trump is found guilty on 34 felony counts.   
   >>> MAY 30, 2024   
      
   >> So paying Daniels for her silence was legal.   
      
   > It was an illegal campaign contribution.   
      
   By whom?   
      
   >>> The jurors said they unanimously agreed   
   >>> that Trump falsified business records to   
   >>> conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to   
   >>> adult film star Stormy Daniels to influence   
   >>> the outcome of the 2016 election.   
   >>> https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts   
      
   >> That was an accounting dispute.   
      
   > No, it was not an "accounting dispute," Your Grace. It was cooking the books,   
   > and it was done to conceal another crime,...   
      
   What crime?   
      
   > ... which is why it was a felony.   
      
   After the statute of limitations had expired.   
      
   >> Daniels accepted "hush money" to keep silent. She didn't keep silent. Should   
   >> Trump sue her for violating the NDA and demand the payment back, with   
   damages   
   >> and attorney fees?   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)