XPost: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics   
   XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: tcoop@uraniumone.com   
      
   On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some   
   news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca:   
      
   > In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,   
   > Joel wrote:   
   >>pothead wrote:   
   >>>On 2025-04-25, Joel wrote:   
   >>>> slothe wrote:   
   >>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple posted some   
   >>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> Simply amazing!   
   >>>>>> I want it all!   
   >>>>>> I want it both ways!   
   >>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!   
   >>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>That's ridiculous.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular   
   >>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the   
   >>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their   
   >>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to   
   >>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.   
   >>>   
   >>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new   
   >>>meaning.   
   >>>   
   >>>ROTFLMAO!   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to   
   >>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is delusional   
   >>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to   
   >>have both parts, let them.   
   >>   
   >>--   
   >>Joel W. Crump   
   >>   
   >>Amendment XIV   
   >>Section 1.   
   >>   
   >>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   >>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   >>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   >>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   >>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   >>protection of the laws.   
   >>   
   >>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are   
   >>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
   >   
   > What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?   
      
   Ontario isn't part of Canada? Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|